Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.6K
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

230
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
230
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

11.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.2K
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

331
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
331
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.9K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

12.8K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Unified and Fast-Sampling Diffusion Bridge Framework via Stochastic Optimal Control.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Broussonin A Attenuates Type 2 Diabetic Osteoporosis by Reactivating JAK2/STAT3 Signaling to Inhibit Ferroptosis in BMSCs.

Phytotherapy research : PTR·2026
Same author

Cross-subject fMRI-to-Image with Visual-cortex 2D Representation and Pre-Training.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

Correction to "Engineering Ene-Reductases for the Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of a Sacubitril Intermediate and Its Derivatives".

Organic letters·2026
Same author

Ubiquitinated proteomics reveals potential epigenetic-energy metabolism mechanisms in senescent ovarian granulosa cells of advanced maternal age.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2026
Same author

A Vascular Invasion-Related Gene Signature Identifies NUP35 as a Driver of Angiogenesis and Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Biomedicines·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Knockoffs-SPR: Clean Sample Selection in Learning With Noisy Labels.

Yikai Wang, Yanwei Fu, Xinwei Sun

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
    |December 1, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a new framework to identify clean data for training neural networks, improving model performance. The Knockoffs-SPR method provably controls errors in selecting clean samples, enhancing robustness.

    More Related Videos

    Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
    08:56

    Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

    Published on: January 13, 2023

    2.2K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    7.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

    A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
    12:18

    A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Published on: January 11, 2020

    7.6K
    Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
    08:56

    Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

    Published on: January 13, 2023

    2.2K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    7.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Computer Science
    • Statistics

    Background:

    • Noisy training datasets degrade neural network generalization and robustness.
    • Accurate identification of clean samples is crucial for effective model training.
    • Existing methods may struggle with identifying clean data under general conditions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a theoretically guaranteed framework for clean sample selection in learning with noisy labels.
    • To develop a data-adaptive method that controls the False-Selection-Rate (FSR).
    • To enhance the scalability and efficiency of the clean sample selection process.

    Main Methods:

    • Introduced Scalable Penalized Regression (SPR) to model feature-label relationships and identify clean data.
    • Developed Knockoffs-SPR, a data-adaptive extension of SPR with provable FSR control.
    • Implemented a split algorithm for parallel processing to achieve scalability for large datasets.
    • Integrated Knockoffs-SPR with a semi-supervised algorithm to leverage noisy data as unlabeled data.

    Main Results:

    • SPR theoretically identifies clean data under specific conditions.
    • Knockoffs-SPR effectively controls the FSR, reducing false selections of noisy data.
    • The split algorithm ensures the framework's scalability to large datasets.
    • Experimental results demonstrate the framework's effectiveness on benchmark and real-world noisy datasets.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed Knockoffs-SPR framework offers a theoretically sound and practically effective solution for learning with noisy labels.
    • The integration with semi-supervised learning further enhances the utility of noisy data.
    • The developed methods significantly improve the robustness and generalization of neural networks trained on imperfect datasets.