Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Subway-related trauma at an urban level I trauma center.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Effects of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides on amphibian development from early cleavage to metamorphosis: A systematic review of laboratory evidence.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

The Fast and the Fragile: Neurosurgical Trauma in the Age of Micromobility.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Anatomic Predilection of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Gliomas: A Multi-Institutional Spatial Analysis.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Natural Language Processing Methods Automate Molecular Marker Extraction From Glioma Pathology Reports.

Neurosurgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.4K

Performance on a target acquisition task differs between augmented reality and touch screen displays.

Hannah Weiss1, Jianyang Tang2, Connor Williams2

  • 1University of Michigan, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, USA.

Applied Ergonomics
|December 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Touchscreen interfaces offer superior performance in target acquisition tasks compared to augmented reality (AR) displays. This study highlights key differences in accuracy, speed, and error rates for human-computer interaction design.

Keywords:
Augmented realityFitts' lawHand-eye coordination

More Related Videos

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.4K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
  • Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research

Background:

  • Target acquisition tasks are crucial for evaluating human motor and perceptual skills in interface design.
  • Assessing sensorimotor performance is vital for developing effective human-computer interfaces.
  • Understanding display modality effects is key to optimizing user experience in interactive systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of display modality, specifically touchscreen versus augmented reality (AR), on a 2D multidirectional target acquisition task.
  • To quantify performance differences in accuracy, precision, error rates, throughput, and movement time between touchscreen and AR interfaces.
  • To provide design recommendations for AR interfaces based on empirical performance data.

Main Methods:

  • A standardized 2D multidirectional target acquisition task was administered to 32 participants.
  • Participants performed the task using both touchscreen and AR display modalities.
  • Two indexes of difficulty were employed to assess performance under varying task complexities.

Main Results:

  • Touchscreen modality demonstrated significantly better performance across all measured metrics compared to AR.
  • Throughput was substantially higher for touchscreen (10.12 bits/s) than for AR (3.11 bits/s) at the nominal index of difficulty.
  • Touchscreen interaction resulted in higher accuracy, precision, and lower error rates and movement times.

Conclusions:

  • Touchscreen displays are currently more effective than AR for standard target acquisition tasks requiring high accuracy and efficiency.
  • AR interface designers should consider larger target sizes and incorporate perceptual cues (e.g., depth, proximity) to enhance user performance.
  • Future AR interface development should focus on improving perceptual feedback and interaction precision to bridge the performance gap with touchscreens.