Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.3K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.3K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.3K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.8K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.8K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.7K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.3K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.4K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A copula based supervised filter for feature selection in machine learning driven diabetes risk prediction.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Confidence intervals and prediction intervals for two-parameter negative binomial distributions.

Journal of applied statistics·2024
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.9K

Confidence estimation based on data from independent studies.

Kalimuthu Krishnamoorthy1, Md Monzur Murshed1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|December 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a general method for calculating confidence intervals from multiple independent studies by inverting combined tests. The approach offers a robust way to analyze pooled data across various statistical models.

Keywords:
Combination of testsGraybill-Deal estimatorcoefficient of variationcorrelation coefficientmodified likelihood ratio testprecision

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.9K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Meta-analysis

Background:

  • Synthesizing evidence from multiple independent studies is crucial for robust statistical inference.
  • Existing methods for constructing confidence intervals from combined data may have limitations in coverage probability and precision.
  • Developing versatile methods applicable to diverse data distributions is essential for meta-analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general method for constructing confidence intervals by inverting combined tests for data from several independent studies.
  • To evaluate the performance of confidence intervals derived from Fisher's test, weighted inverse normal test, inverse chi-square test, and inverse Cauchy test.
  • To compare these novel confidence intervals with existing approximate methods regarding coverage probability and precision.

Main Methods:

  • A general framework for confidence interval construction by inverting combined tests is presented.
  • The method is applied to various scenarios, including common means of normal, lognormal, and gamma populations, and common correlation coefficients and coefficients of variation.
  • Performance evaluation involves comparing coverage probability and precision against established approximate confidence intervals.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method provides a unified approach to confidence interval estimation across different statistical models.
  • Confidence intervals derived from combined tests demonstrate competitive or superior performance in terms of coverage and precision compared to existing methods.
  • The study provides R functions for practical implementation and illustrates the methods with real-world examples.

Conclusions:

  • Inverting combined tests offers a powerful and generalizable strategy for constructing confidence intervals in meta-analysis.
  • The proposed method enhances the reliability of statistical inference when pooling data from multiple independent sources.
  • The availability of R functions facilitates the application of these advanced statistical techniques in research.