Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical Outcomes from Nationwide Implementation of the International Best-Practice for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PREOPANC-4) study.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Ten simple rules for turning your qualifying exam into an NIH-style fellowship proposal: A guide for graduate students.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Delayed gastric emptying after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: the Transatlantic Robot Pancreas Consortium (TROPANC).

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Surgical technique for fully robotic two-stage hepatectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for bilobar colorectal liver metastases.

Journal of visualized surgery·2026
Same author

Contemporary challenges in long-term survival prediction in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a transatlantic multicenter development and validation of prognostic models.

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association·2026
Same author

Activity and Physiological Stress Within 90 Days After Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Predefined Analysis of the DIPLOMA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Sabir et al. DNA Based and Stimuli-Responsive Smart Nanocarrier for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: Applications and Challenges. <i>Cancers</i> 2021, <i>13</i>, 3396.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones
11:43

Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones

Published on: November 30, 2016

12.7K

Identifying Genetic Mutation Status in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Using Radiomics-Based

Nina Wesdorp1,2, Michiel Zeeuw1,2, Delanie van der Meulen1,2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Cancers
|December 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Radiomics features from CT scans show promise in predicting KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer liver metastases. However, models performed poorly in external validation, highlighting the need for rigorous validation before clinical use.

Keywords:
CT scanKRAS mutationcolorectal cancergenetic mutationliver metastasesradiomics

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma
07:59

Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma

Published on: September 3, 2021

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones
11:43

Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones

Published on: November 30, 2016

12.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma
07:59

Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma

Published on: September 3, 2021

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Genetic mutation status, particularly KRAS, is crucial for treatment selection and prognosis in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).
  • Radiomics, the extraction of quantitative imaging features, offers a non-invasive approach to assess tumor characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between radiomics features from CT scans and KRAS mutation status in CRLM patients.
  • To validate machine-learning models for predicting KRAS mutation status using radiomics in an independent external dataset.

Main Methods:

  • Radiomics features were extracted from semi-automatically segmented CRLM in pre-treatment CT scans from the CAIRO5 trial (n=255).
  • Machine learning classifiers (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, Ensemble) were trained to predict KRAS mutation status.
  • Model performance was evaluated internally and externally using the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI) dataset (n=129).

Main Results:

  • Internal validation showed good performance with AUC scores ranging from 0.72 to 0.86 for the machine-learning models.
  • External validation demonstrated significantly poorer performance, with AUC scores between 0.47 and 0.56.
  • The study highlights a discrepancy between internal and external validation results.

Conclusions:

  • Machine-learning models using CT radiomics can identify KRAS mutation status in CRLM with good internal accuracy.
  • Poor performance in external validation underscores the critical need for robust external validation of radiomics models.
  • Mandatory external validation is essential for assessing the clinical applicability of radiomics in future CRLM research.