Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

668
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
668

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Prevalence and Impact of False Air-Bone Gaps in Clinical Audiometry: A Study of 1,000 Ears.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Recommended Audiological Test Battery Following Combat Noise Exposure: A Clinical Approach.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Exploring the impact of physical activity on speech comprehension in loud noise while using hearing protection (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Compatibility of the Digit-in-Noise Test with Hearing Screening in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Pilot Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Hebrew Digits in Noise (DIN) Test in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Audiology research·2024
Same author

Individual Differences in Auditory Training Benefits for Hearing Aid Users.

Clinics and practice·2023
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Measuring "Where": A Comparative Analysis of Methods Measuring Spatial Perception.

Leah Fostick1, Nir Fink2

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, Auditory Perception Lab in the Name of Laurent Levy, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared six sound localization measures, finding the mirror image reversal error (MIRE) and very large error (VLE) methods most sensitive to specific variables. The best measure depends on the research question and expected effect size.

Keywords:
mean absolute deviation (MAD)measuring methodsmirror image reversal errors (MIRE)root-mean-squared error (RMSE)sound localization

More Related Videos

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate sound localization is crucial for human auditory perception and interaction.
  • Existing literature presents multiple methods for quantifying sound localization accuracy.
  • A comparative analysis of these methods is needed to guide research design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of six distinct sound localization measurement methods.
  • To examine how different variables (speaker angle, stimuli, HPD type, condition) influence effect sizes across measures.
  • To provide guidance on selecting the most appropriate measurement method based on research objectives.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from 150 participants localizing sound sources.
  • Application of six quantitative methods: mean absolute deviation (MAD), root-mean-squared error (RMSE), very large errors (VLE), percentage of errors larger than the average error (pMean), percentage of errors larger than half the distance between loudspeakers (pHalf), and mirror image reversal errors (MIRE).
  • Investigation of effects related to speaker angle, stimuli type, hearing protection device (HPD) type, and presence/absence of HPD.

Main Results:

  • The mirror image reversal error (MIRE) measure demonstrated highest sensitivity to speaker angle and HPD type.
  • The very large error (VLE) measure was most sensitive to variations in stimuli type.
  • The condition (with/without HPD) yielded the largest overall effect sizes, with no significant differences between measurement methods.
  • All methods were adequate for substantial effect sizes, but specialized methods are preferable for small effect sizes.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of sound localization measurement method should align with the specific research question and anticipated effect sizes.
  • MIRE and VLE offer distinct advantages for detecting specific experimental effects in sound localization research.
  • Understanding the sensitivity of each measure is key to optimizing experimental design and data interpretation in auditory research.