Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Robotic-Assisted Electrode Insertion for Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: A Multicenter Study.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Prospective longitudinal observational study at an academic medical centre of lifestyle and cognition in older adults with a cochlear implant or hearing aid: study protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Word Learning Ability Varies Across Contexts and Time: A Longitudinal Study of Primary School Children with Developmental Language Disorder.

Autism & developmental language impairments·2026
Same author

Assessment of Surgical Salvage Outcomes for Exposed Cranial Neuromodulating Devices.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same author

Presynaptic Ca<sub>V</sub>2.1 calcium dependent facilitation is essential for faithful auditory information transfer.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.4K

Evaluation of Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography for Guiding Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Position.

Rachel Scheperle1, Christine Etler1, Jacob Oleson2

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|December 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) during cochlear implantation showed that electrode location confounds results. Electrode position significantly impacts ECochG amplitude readings, affecting real-time interpretation and hearing preservation predictions.

Keywords:
cochlear implantelectrocochleographyhearing preservation

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

448

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

448

Area of Science:

  • Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Evoked Potentials
  • Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology

Background:

  • Real-time monitoring during cochlear implantation is crucial for preserving hearing.
  • Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential tool for intraoperative monitoring.
  • The interpretation of ECochG signals can be confounded by the recording electrode's position.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate intracochlear ECochG for real-time monitoring during cochlear implantation.
  • To determine if adjusting the recording electrode site can differentiate atraumatic from traumatic ECochG amplitude decrements.
  • To assess if considering hearing sensitivity at the ECochG stimulus frequency improves the association with post-operative hearing loss.

Main Methods:

  • Single-frequency (500-Hz) ECochG was performed in 11 adult cochlear implant recipients.
  • The amplitude of the first harmonic of the difference waveform was analyzed.
  • Post-operative hearing preservation was assessed at 500 Hz.

Main Results:

  • A trend between ECochG amplitude decrements and hearing preservation was observed but not statistically significant.
  • Predictions of hearing preservation were inaccurate for two participants.
  • Considering alternative recording sites or broader frequency ranges did not improve the association between ECochG decrements and hearing loss.

Conclusions:

  • Intracochlear recording electrode location is a significant confounder for real-time ECochG interpretation.
  • Multiple factors influence ECochG amplitude patterns and hearing preservation.
  • The study highlights the confounding effect of intracochlear electrode placement on ECochG during cochlear implantation.