Does topical vancomycin prevent fracture-related infections in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and

Mohit Gandhi1, Gopisankar Balaji1, Jagdish Menon1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.

Abstract

Insights

Topical vancomycin did not significantly reduce fracture-related infections (FRI) in closed fractures. While no infections occurred in the vancomycin group, impaired healing was noted, warranting further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Fracture-related infections (FRI) pose a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery.
  • The efficacy of topical vancomycin in preventing FRI, particularly in closed fractures requiring surgical intervention, remains under investigation.
  • Limited data exists on its use in open and high-risk extremity fractures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of topical vancomycin in reducing the incidence of fracture-related infections (FRI) in patients with closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation.
  • To compare the outcomes of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis alone versus combined topical vancomycin and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized cohort study involving 88 patients with closed fractures planned for open reduction and internal fixation within two weeks of injury.
  • Patients were randomized into two groups: a control group receiving systemic antibiotics and an intervention group receiving topical vancomycin powder plus systemic antibiotics.
  • The primary outcome was the incidence of FRI at 6 weeks post-surgery, with secondary assessments including clinical, radiological findings, and culture reports.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in FRI incidence was observed between the groups (p=0.494).
  • The intervention group had no infections at 6 weeks, while the control group had two infections (4.5%).
  • Radiologically, 2.3% of the intervention group showed periprosthetic lysis versus 15.9% in the control group. However, impaired fracture healing was observed in 22.7% of the intervention group compared to 15.9% in the control group.

Conclusions:

  • Topical vancomycin application in closed fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation did not significantly decrease the incidence of FRI at 6 weeks post-surgery.
  • While showing a trend towards fewer infections and reduced periprosthetic lysis, potential adverse effects like impaired fracture healing require consideration.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the role and safety profile of topical vancomycin in managing fracture-related infections.