Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Creative Thinking01:25

Creative Thinking

873
Creative thinking encompasses innovative and unconventional methods for addressing challenges, often leading to groundbreaking solutions. Instead of focusing solely on enhancing existing systems, such as increasing smartphone battery capacity, creative thinking might inspire advancements like energy-efficient batteries or processors that minimize power consumption. This multidimensional approach underscores the importance of exploring novel pathways to innovation.
Divergent thinking is the...
873
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

243
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
243
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

108
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
108
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.8K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Mental health in challenging situations: how experienced agency affects coping and mental distress.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Affective evaluation of self-produced action-effect episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Binding continuous response features of extended movements: Integration with discrete response but not stimulus features.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Desert lizards modulate nutritional responses to match seasonal biological needs.

Royal Society open science·2026
Same journal

Multi-generational fidelity, ecological and social determinants of roosting in a cooperatively breeding bird (<i>Argya squamiceps</i>).

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Multifaceted polarization and information reliability in climate change discussions on social media platforms.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Comparing the kinematics related to inflicted head injury between violent shaking of a 6-week-old and a 1-year-old infant surrogate.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Partner choice increases observed reciprocity-based cooperation but decreases unobserved stake-based cooperation.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Importation models for travel-related SARS-CoV-2 cases reported in Newfoundland and Labrador during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Royal Society open science·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Creative thinking does not promote dishonesty.

Moritz Reis1, Roland Pfister1,2, Wilfried Kunde1

  • 1Department of Psychology (III), University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.

Royal Society Open Science
|December 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that while dishonest behavior increased after a thinking style manipulation, the increase did not differ between creative or rule-based thinking tasks. Trait creativity also showed no link to dishonesty.

Keywords:
creativitydishonestymoralitythinking styleunethical behaviour

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Ethics

Background:

  • Previous research suggests a link between creativity and unethical behavior.
  • However, the precise nature and conditions of this relationship remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between creativity and unethical behavior.
  • To examine if manipulating thinking styles (divergent, convergent, rule-based) influences dishonest behavior.

Main Methods:

  • 450 adult participants were assigned to one of three thinking style inducer tasks.
  • Dishonest behavior was measured using a mind game before and after the task.
  • Exploratory analyses assessed the correlation between trait creativity and dishonesty.

Main Results:

  • Dishonest behavior significantly increased across all participants after the thinking style manipulation.
  • No significant differences in the increase of dishonest behavior were observed between the divergent, convergent, or rule-based thinking groups.
  • Exploratory analyses found no significant relationship between trait creativity and dishonesty.

Conclusions:

  • The impact of creative thinking on unethical behavior appears more complex and less direct than previously assumed.
  • The findings suggest that the link between creativity and unethical behavior may be context-dependent or specific to certain populations.