Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
  1. Home
  2. Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.
  1. Home
  2. Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do You See the Difference Between Perfection and Excellence?

Psychology research and behavior management·2026
Same author

Action Selection by Temporally Close Transitions? Subtle Evidence from the Removal of Tactile Stimulation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Feature binding and error commission.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Error-Related Brain Activity Indicates Immediate Auto-Cancellation of Action Slips.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

Unitization Based Memory Enhancement in Younger and Older Adults.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Anticipated Imitation Is Not Affected by the Number of Imitators.

Experimental psychology·2025
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

A Network of Actions - Evaluating False Recall and Recognition of Objects After Studying Affordances.

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Sámuel Varga1, Joshua Kah Meng Khoo2, Denis Cousineau3

  • 1Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, Trier University, Trier, Germany.

Experimental Psychology
|June 22, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Swift error cancellation is a general human ability, even for novel tasks. This automatic performance monitoring mechanism can terminate errors within milliseconds of initiation, demonstrating broad applicability beyond simple action slips.

Keywords:
error cancellationerror processingmotor inhibitionperformance monitoring

Related Experiment Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Performance Monitoring

Background:

  • Performance monitoring models suggest early post-error periods focus on detection, not mitigation.
  • Recent studies indicate erroneous actions can be terminated within ~100 ms (error cancellation).
  • Prior error cancellation evidence was limited to highly over-learned tasks and rapid action slips.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the generalizability of error cancellation to different error types.
  • To examine if error cancellation applies to medium-speed errors in novel instruction implementation.
  • To determine if error cancellation is an automatic component of human performance monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of three publicly available datasets.
  • Studying medium-speed errors arising from incorrect rule application during novel instruction learning.
  • Examining error termination within the early post-response period.

Main Results:

  • Error cancellation was observed in medium-speed errors involving rule misapplication.
  • The findings extend beyond rapid action slips in over-learned tasks.
  • Error cancellation demonstrates generality across different error types and task complexities.

Conclusions:

  • Swift error cancellation is a general and automatic aspect of human performance monitoring.
  • This mechanism operates broadly, not just in highly practiced tasks.
  • Error cancellation is a fundamental component of how humans monitor and correct their actions.