Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome with Mild-to-Moderate Thrombocytopenia

Yicong Ye1, Yongchen Hao2, Xiliang Zhao1

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis
|December 11, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia significantly reduces major adverse cardiac events and net adverse clinical events. However, it is associated with an increased risk of any bleeding, but not major bleeding.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Baseline thrombocytopenia is a frequent comorbidity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • Mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia is defined as a platelet count between 50 × 109/L and 150 × 109/L.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and mild-to-moderate baseline thrombocytopenia.
  • To assess the association between PCI and in-hospital clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and bleeding events.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome project, including 50,009 ACS patients.
  • Focus on 6,413 patients with mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia.
  • Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method used to analyze associations between PCI and in-hospital outcomes (NACE, MACE, bleeding).

Main Results:

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31-0.67) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42-0.83).
  • PCI was linked to an increased risk of any bleeding (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.09-2.22) and minor bleeding (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.00-2.30).
  • No significant association was found between PCI and an increased risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.76-2.98).

Conclusions:

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrates improved in-hospital outcomes compared to medical therapy alone in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia.
  • Further research is warranted to investigate the long-term prognostic implications of PCI in this patient cohort.
Abstract