Comparison of Wrist and Forearm EMG for Multi-day Biometric Authentication

Recently, electromyography (EMG) has been established as a promising new biometric trait that provides a unique dual mode security: biometrics and knowledge. For authentication that is used daily and long-term by general consumers, the wrist is a suitable location, which could be easily integrated into the existing form of smartwatches and fitness trackers. However, current EMG-based biometrics still follow the historical path of powered prosthetics research, where EMG signals were usually recorded from forearm positions. Moreover, the robustness of EMG processing algorithms across multiple days is still an open problem that needs to be addressed before for long-term reliable use. This study intends to investigate the difference in authentication performance between wrist and forearm EMG signals, in a within-day and two cross-day analyses. Our open dataset (GRABMyo dataset) was used to examine this difference, which contains forearm and wrist EMG data collected from 43 participants over three different days with long separation (Days 1, 8, and 29). The results showed wrist EMG signals led to at least comparable with forearm EMG signals in within-day Equal-error rate (EER). In cross-day analysis, the EER of the wrist EMG signals was higher than that of forearm signals. In general, the low median EER (<0.1) of wrist EMG in cumulative cross-day analysis demonstrates the promise of using wrist EMG signals for authentication in long-term applications.