The Discordance between G-Banding Karyotyping and Microarray in Structural Abnormality

Cytomolecular genetic laboratory techniques have developed from conventional G-banding karyotyping to whole genome sequencing. Although resolution has greatly increased, various cytogenetic techniques have their advantages and limitations in detecting genomic variations.

We compared the chromosomal abnormalities detected by G-banding karyotyping and SNP-based microarray testing in 62 patients from July 2020 to December 2022. We analyzed their difference according to chromosomal abnormalities, including numerical and structural and others.

Of the 62 patients, 28 patients showed chromosomal aberration detected in one or more of the two test methods. Aneuploidy was detected in both methods, while gain and loss less than 3 Mb were only detectable by the microarray. G-banding karyotyping is fundamental to detect structural chromosome rearrangement such as inversions, ring chromosomes, and translocations, but additional breakpoint or unknown origin materials informa-tion obtained from microarray. Loss of heterozygosity was only detectable in microarray, and mosaicism had limitations in both G-banding karyotyping and microarray.

Various disease cause genomic structural variants, it is very important to detect this. We showed discordance between G-banding karyotyping and SNP based microarray in clinical laboratory. It can be helpful to clinical physicians to decide which diagnostic tool to use.