Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Differential Staining Technique01:26

Differential Staining Technique

Differential staining is an essential microbiological technique that exploits variations in cell wall structures to classify and identify microorganisms. It facilitates the distinction of bacteria, aiding in diagnostic and research applications. Two of the most widely used differential staining methods are Gram staining and acid-fast staining, both of which rely on the chemical and structural differences in bacterial cell walls.Gram Staining TechniqueGram staining differentiates bacteria by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Importance of Standardizing Laboratory Medicine in a Super-aging Society.

Public health weekly report·2026
Same author

Essential Data Elements for Laboratory Test Interoperability: An Expert Consensus-Based Framework.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

When Direct LDL Cholesterol Assays Fail: a Case Series of Analytically Implausible Results.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Proposal for Modified Alpha Fetoprotein Use in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: Analysis of the 2018-2020 National Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for therapeutic drug monitoring of treosulfan.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations for Assessing Kidney Function in Korean Pediatric Patients.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Fish-shaped erythrocytes and pincer cells co-occur in distinct hematological disorders and are associated with anemia severity.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Artificial general intelligence and the clinical laboratory: a paradigm shift toward Lab 2.0.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Addressing property and unit discordance in laboratory interoperability: the role of NPU as a governance layer.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Ethical evaluation of reflex and reflective testing in conformity with ISO 15189:2022 at the value-based laboratory medicine era.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Emerging blood-based diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Homocitrulline and 3-year mortality in older hospitalised adults: an exploratory study.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Utilizing Label-free Biosensor Technology
08:27

Detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Utilizing Label-free Biosensor Technology

Published on: March 24, 2015

14.8K

Machine learning-based delta check method for detecting misidentification errors in tumor marker tests.

Hyeon Seok Seok1, Yuna Choi2, Shinae Yu3

  • 1Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Engineering, Chonnam National University, Yeosu, Republic of Korea.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|December 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning delta checks, particularly the deep neural network (DNN) model, significantly improve the detection of tumor marker sample misidentification errors. This advanced approach surpasses traditional methods in accuracy and reliability for critical diagnostic tests.

Keywords:
artificial intelligenceautoverificationdeep neural networkdelta checkmachine learningtumor markers

More Related Videos

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
08:14

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening

Published on: October 26, 2017

15.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Utilizing Label-free Biosensor Technology
08:27

Detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Utilizing Label-free Biosensor Technology

Published on: March 24, 2015

14.8K
MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
08:14

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening

Published on: October 26, 2017

15.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Bioinformatics
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Tumor marker test misidentification errors pose significant risks to patient diagnosis and treatment.
  • Conventional delta check methods have limitations in accurately detecting these errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML)-based delta check method for detecting sample misidentification in tumor marker tests.
  • To compare the efficacy of ML models against traditional delta check approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 246,261 records for five tumor markers: AFP, CA19-9, CA125, CEA, and PSA.
  • Development of ML models using random forest (RF) and deep neural network (DNN) algorithms.
  • Comparison of ML models with delta percent change (DPC), absolute DPC (absDPC), and reference change values (RCV) using in silico simulations.

Main Results:

  • The DNN model demonstrated superior balanced accuracies across all tested tumor markers (0.792-0.842).
  • The DNN model outperformed RF, DPC, absDPC, and RCV in detecting misidentification errors.
  • The RF model showed mixed performance, generally better than DPC and absDPC but comparable or lower than RCV.

Conclusions:

  • ML-based delta check methods are more effective than conventional approaches for detecting tumor marker sample misidentification.
  • The DNN model offers a robust and stable solution for improving the accuracy of tumor marker testing.