Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transfer Accuracy of Closed-Tray Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparison Across Five Implant Systems.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2026
Same author

Impact of Deep-Learning Reconstruction on MRI Workflows: A Retrospective Analysis at a Large Academic Tertiary Center.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2026
Same author

Unveiling the Chemical Profile, Biological Activity, and Docking Studies of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana.

Current pharmaceutical biotechnology·2026
Same author

Photon Counting CT of the Head: Retrospective Analysis of Image Quality and Dose in Comparison to Energy Integrating Detector CT.

Academic radiology·2026
Same author

A longitudinal whole-body CT dataset with manually annotated tumor lesions.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Real-time planar angiographic cerebral perfusion imaging.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

408

Comparative Mechanical Testing for Digitally Produced Provisional Fixed Partial Dentures vs the Conventional Method:

Ahmed Othman, Dragan A Ströbele, Alexander Lüllmann

    The International Journal of Prosthodontics
    |December 18, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary

    Milled implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) demonstrated superior fracture strength compared to 3D-printed and conventionally fabricated ones. Digital fabrication methods show promise for durable dental prostheses.

    More Related Videos

    Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
    03:02

    Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

    Published on: January 17, 2025

    339
    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
    11:51

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

    Published on: February 10, 2014

    15.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 8, 2025

    Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
    07:42

    Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

    Published on: December 20, 2024

    408
    Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
    03:02

    Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

    Published on: January 17, 2025

    339
    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
    11:51

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

    Published on: February 10, 2014

    15.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Dental Materials Science
    • Biomaterials Engineering
    • Prosthodontics

    Background:

    • Digital dentistry is revolutionizing prosthodontics, offering alternatives to conventional fabrication methods.
    • Assessing the mechanical integrity of implant-supported prostheses is crucial for clinical success.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the fracture strength of implant-cemented fixed partial denture (FPD) prostheses.
    • To evaluate FPDs fabricated using digital (3D printing, milling) versus conventional chairside methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Three groups of FPDs were fabricated: 3D printing (Group A), milling (Group B), and conventional chairside (Group C).
    • Specimens were cemented to implant abutments in artificial bone blocks and subjected to fracture strength testing using a universal testing machine.
    • Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05).

    Main Results:

    • The mean fracture load for milled FPDs (Group B) was 663.57 N ± 140.55.
    • 3D-printed FPDs (Group A) had a mean fracture load of 260.14 N ± 28.88.
    • Conventional FPDs (Group C) exhibited a mean fracture load of 266.65 N ± 63.66.

    Conclusions:

    • Milled provisional FPDs demonstrated significantly higher fracture resistance than 3D-printed and conventional groups.
    • No significant difference in fracture resistance was found between 3D-printed and conventionally fabricated FPDs.