Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical therapy.

D Hauri

    Urologia Internationalis
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Conventional stone removal techniques are still practiced due to fewer complications compared to modern methods like extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures. This review discusses the technical details of these effective conventional approaches.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Will surgeons be replaced by technicians?].

    Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2010
    Same author

    Development of an easily interpretable presentation format for meta-analyses in periodontal surgery.

    Evidence-based dentistry·2008
    Same author

    [Medical geography].

    Praxis·2007
    Same author

    Experience with 100 cases treated with botulinum-A toxin injections in the detrusor muscle for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome refractory to anticholinergics.

    The Journal of urology·2006
    Same author

    Retroperitoneoscopic nephropexy for symptomatic nephroptosis using a modified three-point fixation technique.

    Urology·2005
    Same author

    Neurovascular bundle block as predictor of postoperative erectile function after radical prostatectomy.

    International journal of impotence research·2005
    Same journal

    Clinical presentation of chronic abacterial prostatitis shows no association with TAS2R38 taster status.

    Urologia internationalis·2026
    Same journal

    Robotic-Assisted Lingual Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty for Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Case Report and Literature Review.

    Urologia internationalis·2026
    Same journal

    Laser Resectoscope Versus Cystoscope in Transurethral Management of Bladder Stones: A Comparative Study.

    Urologia internationalis·2026
    Same journal

    12-years real-life data on successful management of recurrent urinary tract infections by OM-89 and its impact on bacterial resistance.

    Urologia internationalis·2026
    Same journal

    Correlation of Prostate Tumor Laterality with Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis Patterns- A Retrospective Observational Study.

    Urologia internationalis·2026
    Same journal

    Pilot Survey about the perspective on Generation Z among European leaders in Urology: Challenges in educating Generation Z.

    Urologia internationalis·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Techniques

    Background:

    • Modern stone removal methods like extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures have largely replaced conventional techniques.
    • These modern methods, while effective, present certain disadvantages and complications.
    • Conventional stone operations, despite being less common, are still utilized in practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the disadvantages associated with modern stone removal methods.
    • To highlight the benefits and continued relevance of conventional stone removal techniques.
    • To provide technical details of conventional stone operations.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of modern stone removal techniques (extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, endoscopic stone removal).
    • Discussion of complications and disadvantages of modern methods.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Detailed explanation of the technical aspects of conventional stone operations.

    • Main Results:

    • Modern stone removal methods have significant disadvantages.
    • Conventional stone operations offer a complication-free alternative.
    • Technical details of conventional methods are presented for continued practice.

    Conclusions:

    • Conventional stone operations remain a viable and safe option for stone removal.
    • Understanding the technical aspects of conventional methods is crucial for their continued application.
    • The choice of stone removal technique should consider potential complications and patient outcomes.