Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Low Body Weight Critically Ill Patients
Helena Knox1, Stephanie B Edwin1, Christopher Giuliano1,2
1Department of Pharmacy, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Insights
Reduced-dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill, low body weight patients significantly lowered bleeding risk compared to standard doses. This strategy maintained similar rates of thromboembolic events, offering a safer approach for this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Background:
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is crucial in critically ill patients.
- Low body weight patients present unique challenges for standard VTE prophylaxis dosing.
- Optimizing VTE prophylaxis in low body weight patients is essential to balance efficacy and safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events between reduced-dose and standard-dose VTE prophylaxis in critically ill, low body weight patients.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjusted VTE prophylaxis strategies in a specific patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving five Ascension Health Hospitals.
- Included adult, critically ill patients weighing ≤50 kg who received either reduced-dose (n=140) or standard-dose (n=279) VTE prophylaxis for ≥48 hours.
- Analyzed composite bleeding, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and VTE events.
Main Results:
- Reduced-dose VTE prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower composite bleeding rates (5% vs. 12.5%, P=0.02).
- Adjusted analysis confirmed reduced composite bleeding with reduced-dose prophylaxis (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14-0.96).
- Rates of VTE events were similar between groups (2.2% vs. 0%, P=0.08), with a trend towards lower major bleeding in the reduced-dose group (3.6% vs. 8.6%, P=0.056).
Conclusions:
- Reduced-dose VTE prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of bleeding in critically ill, low body weight patients.
- This adjusted dosing strategy appears safe and effective, maintaining similar thromboembolic event rates.
- Findings suggest a potential benefit of individualized VTE prophylaxis in this patient population.
Objective:
To compare bleeding and thromboembolic events in low body weight patients receiving reduced-dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis versus standard-dose VTE prophylaxis.
Design:
Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study.
Setting:
Five Ascension Health Hospitals.
Patients:
Adult, critically ill, low body weight (≤50 kg) patients who received either reduced-dose VTE prophylaxis (n = 140) or standard-dose VTE prophylaxis (n = 279) for at least 48 h.
Intervention:
Reduced-dose prophylaxis (enoxaparin 30 mg daily or heparin 5000 units every 12 h subcutaneously) or standard-dose prophylaxis (enoxaparin 40 mg daily, enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 h, or heparin 5000 units every 8 h subcutaneously).
Measurements And Main Results:
A total of 419 patients were included with a mean weight of 45.1 ± 4.2 kg in the standard-dose group and 44.0 ± 5.1 kg in the reduced-dose prophylaxis group (P = .02). The primary endpoint, composite bleeding, was significantly lower in patients receiving reduced-dose prophylaxis (5% vs 12.5%, P = .02). After adjusting for confounding factors, results remained consistent demonstrating reduced composite bleeding with reduced-dose prophylaxis (odds ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.96). Major bleeding events occurred in 3.6% of reduced-dose patients compared with 8.6% in standard-dose patients (P = .056). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (5.4% vs 2.9%, P = .24) and VTE (2.2% vs 0%, P = .08) events were similar between groups.
Conclusions:
A reduced-dose VTE prophylaxis strategy in low body weight, critically ill patients was associated with a lower risk of composite bleeding and similar rate of thromboembolism.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...

