Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Mapping spin contamination-free potential energy surfaces using restricted open-shell methods with Grassmannians
1Department of Chemistry, Gottwald Center for the Sciences, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA. jake.tan@richmond.edu.
Abstract:
The Lagrange-based Grassmann interpolation (G-Int) method has been extended for open-shell systems using restricted open-shell (RO) methods. The performance of this method was assessed in constructing potential energy surfaces (PESs) for vanadium(II) oxide, benzyl radical, and methanesulfenyl chloride radical cation. The density matrices generated by G-Int when used as initial guesses for self-consistent field (SCF) calculations, exhibit superior performance compared to other traditional SCF initial guess schemes, such as SADMO, GWH, and CORE. Additionally, the energy obtained from the G-Int scheme satisfies the variational principle and outperforms the direct energy-based Lagrange interpolation approach. In the case of methanesulfenyl chloride radical cation, a unique example with a flat PES at the end region along the H-C-S-Cl dihedral angle, the use of an equally-spaced grid sampling leads to significant oscillations near the end of the interval due to the effects of Runge's phenomenon. Introducing an unequally-spaced grid sampling based on a scaled Gauss-Chebyshev quadrature effectively mitigated the Runge's phenomenon, making it suitable for combining with G-Int in constructing PESs for general applications. Thus, G-Int provides an efficient and robust strategy for building spin contamination-free PESs with consistent accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
The Energies of Atomic Orbitals

