Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

10:30
Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
Published on: September 11, 2016
10.8K
Drift on holey landscapes as a dominant evolutionary process.
Ned A Dochtermann1, Brady Klock1, Derek A Roff2
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108.
Summary
Evolutionary models do not accurately predict how genetic variation in quantitative traits is distributed. Findings suggest traits evolve across complex "holey landscapes," challenging current evolutionary theory.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Quantitative genetics
- Phenotypic evolution
Background:
- Organismal phenotypes are shaped by evolutionary processes, often inferred indirectly.
- Trait correlations suggest historical correlated selection and reflect adaptive landscapes.
- Expectations for quantitative trait distribution under evolutionary models are unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distribution of genetic variation in quantitative traits across diverse species.
- To test the predictions of dominant evolutionary models against observed trait variation.
- To explore alternative evolutionary landscapes that may explain observed patterns.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed genetic variation in quantitative traits across six phyla and 60 species (Plantae and Animalia).
- Compared observed trait variation patterns with predictions from dominant evolutionary models.
- Evaluated consistency with evolution across high-dimensional "holey landscapes."
Main Results:
- Genetic variation in quantitative traits does not align with predictions from dominant evolutionary models.
- Observed patterns are consistent with evolution across high-dimensional "holey landscapes."
- Trait integration occurs in a manner contrary to predictions of current evolutionary theory.
Conclusions:
- Current conceptualizations and models of trait integration inadequately capture how phenotypes are shaped by evolution.
- Existing evolutionary models may fail to explain the observed distribution of genetic variation in quantitative traits.
- Further research is needed to reassess and refine evolutionary models based on these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Drift
39.8K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.8K
Instinctive Drift
225
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
225
Drift Velocity
4.2K
The high speed of electrical signals results from the fact that the force between charges acts rapidly at a distance. Thus, when a free charge is forced into a wire, the incoming charge pushes other charges ahead due to the repulsive force between like charges. These moving charges move the charges farther down the line. The density of charge in a system cannot easily be increased, so the signal is passed on rapidly. The resulting electrical shock wave moves through the system at nearly the...
4.2K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
58.4K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.4K
Speciation Rates
21.2K
Overview
21.2K
Habitat Fragmentation
17.5K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
17.5K

