Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Acceptance of disability in stroke: a systematic review
Mervyn Jun Rui Lim1, Jaclyn Tan2, Arturo Yong Yao Neo3
1Division of Neurosurgery, University Surgical Centre, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228 Singapore; Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore, 1 Maritime Square 099253, Singapore.
Background:
Evidence for the association between acceptance of disability (AOD) and positive rehabilitation outcomes, as well as for the use of AOD measurements in stroke rehabilitation practice, has increased in the international literature in the last decade. However, measurement tools for AOD are heterogenous and there has not been a systematic review summarizing the current evidence on the use of AOD measures and factors associated with AOD.
Objective:
This study aimed to summarize current evidence on measurement tools used, present existing AOD scores in people with stroke and identify risk factors for and protective factors against poor AOD in people with stroke.
Methods:
The original design and protocol of this systematic review were registered with PROSPERO. The included studies were published from 2008 to 2020 and identified from 5 databases-PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library-using the following inclusion criteria: participants diagnosed with stroke and aged ≥16 years, measurement of AOD, and published in English in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Review articles were excluded.
Results:
Five measurement tools for AOD were reported. The Revised Acceptance of Disability Scale (ADS-R) and the acceptance subscale of the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ) had the highest internal consistency. Scores ranged from 71.7 to 74.2 on the ADS-R, 16.9-18.3 on the ICQ, 16.5-26.9 on the Acceptance of Illness Scale, and 87.8-93.2 on the Attitudes towards Disabled Persons Form A. Poorer function and depressive symptoms were associated with poor AOD, whereas religious beliefs, support from others, and an understanding of stroke were associated with better AOD.
Conclusions:
The ADS-R and the acceptance subscale of the ICQ are currently the most reliable measurement tools for measuring AOD in people with stroke. Further research to validate the measurement tools is required. This may help to identify people who require additional support.
Trial Registration:
PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42017077063; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=77063.
More Related Videos
07:35Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:15Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
01:27Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
01:29Intellectual Disability
01:25Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...