Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
Real-world comparison between mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic
Hyun Joon Kim1, Dongwook Lee1, Hyung Jun Moon1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31, Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) showed no survival or neurological outcome benefits compared to manual CPR with personal protective equipment (PPE). Mechanical CPR did result in longer resuscitation times in the emergency department.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic increased out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA), necessitating personal protective equipment (PPE) use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
- Mechanical CPR devices were introduced to minimize personnel during resuscitation efforts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of mechanical CPR versus manual CPR performed by PPE-equipped healthcare providers.
- To assess survival rates, neurological outcomes, and CPR duration in OHCA patients.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter observational study using data from the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium registry.
- Propensity score matching created two groups: mechanical CPR (n=421) and PPE-equipped manual CPR (n=421) for OHCA patients in emergency departments (EDs) from March 2020 to June 2021.
- Primary outcomes were survival and favorable neurological outcomes at discharge; secondary outcome was total CPR duration in the ED.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in survival rates (7.4% vs. 8.3%) or favorable neurological outcomes (3.3% vs. 3.8%) between mechanical and manual CPR groups.
- The mechanical CPR group experienced a significantly longer duration of CPR within the ED compared to the manual CPR group.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical CPR did not demonstrate superior outcomes in survival or neurological function compared to manual CPR with PPE in the ED setting.
- A longer CPR duration was associated with mechanical CPR use.
- Further research is needed to understand the impact of PPE on healthcare provider performance and fatigue during CPR.
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, including an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Healthcare providers are now required to use personal protective equipment (PPE) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Additionally, mechanical CPR devices have been introduced to reduce the number of personnel required for resuscitation. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CPR performed with a mechanical device and the outcomes of manual CPR performed by personnel wearing PPE.
Methods:
This multicenter observational study utilized data from the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium registry. The study population consisted of OHCA patients who underwent CPR in emergency departments (EDs) between March 2020 and June 2021. Patients were divided into two equal propensity score matched groups: mechanical CPR group (n = 421) and PPE-equipped manual CPR group (n = 421). Primary outcomes included survival rates and favorable neurological outcomes at discharge. Total CPR duration in the ED was also assessed.
Results:
There were no significant between-group differences with respect to survival rate at discharge (mechanical CPR: 7.4% vs PPE-equipped manual CPR: 8.3%) or favorable neurological outcomes (3.3% vs. 3.8%, respectively). However, the mechanical CPR group had a longer duration of CPR in the ED compared to the manual CPR group.
Conclusion:
This study found no significant differences in survival rates and neurological outcomes between mechanical CPR and PPE-equipped manual CPR in the ED setting. However, a longer total CPR duration was observed in the mechanical CPR group. Further research is required to explore the impact of PPE on healthcare providers' performance and fatigue during CPR in the context of the pandemic and beyond.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

