Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding01:13

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding

45
Physiological models with protein binding in pharmacokinetics offer a sophisticated approach to understanding drug disposition. These models consider drug-protein interactions, enabling them to effectively predict drug concentrations in different organs and tissues. This precision aids in accurate drug dosing, providing a significant advantage over conventional models. A key process within these models is equilibration, which ensures that drug concentrations achieve a steady state within the...
45
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.9K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

7.9K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
7.9K
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods01:22

Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods

196
Determining protein-drug binding can be achieved through indirect and direct methods, each providing valuable insights into the interaction between proteins and drugs.
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
196
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors01:20

Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors

162
Drug binding to proteins is a key aspect of pharmacokinetics and can influence a drug's distribution, absorption, and elimination in the body. Several factors, including the drug's physiochemical properties, protein concentration, disease states, and the number of binding sites on the protein, influence this process.
The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in its ability to bind to proteins. Lipophilic drugs, which dissolve in fats, oils, and lipids, can be...
162

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural basis of opioid receptor activation by PCP and ketamine.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Structural dynamics of kappa opioid receptor interactions with β-arrestin 1.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Structural insights into coffee bitter taste perception by TAS2R43 receptor.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Mechanism of Gating and Isoform-Specific Inhibition in Renal CLC Chloride Channels.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Molecular mechanism of exchange coupling in CLC chloride/proton antiporters.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: Real-world outcomes from a Korean multicenter study.

Gynecologic oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

170

How accurately can one predict drug binding modes using AlphaFold models?

Masha Karelina1,2,3,4,5, Joseph J Noh2,3,4,5, Ron O Dror1,2,3,4,5

  • 1Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.

Elife
|December 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

While AlphaFold 2 accurately models protein structures, its use in predicting drug binding poses for G-protein-coupled receptors shows limited improvement over traditional methods, impacting drug discovery applications.

Keywords:
GPCRdrug discoveryhomology modelingligand pose predictionmolecular biophysicsmolecular dockingnonesmall moleculestructural biology

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.7K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

170
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.7K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Protein structure prediction is crucial for drug discovery.
  • Machine learning, exemplified by AlphaFold 2 (AF2), has advanced protein structure prediction accuracy.
  • The utility of AF2 models for predicting drug-protein interactions remains to be fully elucidated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of AlphaFold 2 models for predicting drug binding poses.
  • To assess the performance of AF2 models in drug discovery targeting G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of AF2 models versus traditional homology models.
  • Assessment of binding pocket accuracy in AF2-predicted protein structures.
  • Computational docking simulations to predict ligand-binding poses on AF2 models and experimental structures.

Main Results:

  • AF2 models provide significantly more accurate representations of GPCR binding pockets than homology models.
  • Despite improved pocket accuracy, computational docking to AF2 models does not yield significantly better ligand-binding pose predictions compared to homology models.
  • Docking accuracy to AF2 models is substantially lower than docking to experimentally determined protein structures.

Conclusions:

  • AlphaFold 2 excels at predicting protein binding site structures but does not directly translate to improved drug-binding pose prediction accuracy.
  • Current computational docking methods may require further development to fully leverage the accuracy of AF2-generated protein models for drug discovery.
  • These findings highlight limitations in using predicted protein structures for drug discovery and necessitate careful consideration of model utility.