Catheter size and risk of short-term peripheral venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: an observational

Matteo Faltoni1, Gaud Catho2, Eva Pianca3

  • 1Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Larger peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are linked to a higher risk of bloodstream infections (BSI). Choosing smaller diameter PVCs may help reduce PVC-associated BSI incidence.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medical Devices
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Short-term peripheral venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (PVC-associated BSI) are often overlooked due to low incidence.
  • Limited data exists on the relationship between PVC diameter and BSI risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between peripheral venous catheter (PVC) diameter size and the risk of PVC-associated bloodstream infections (BSI).

Main Methods:

  • Prospective observational study conducted at University of Geneva Hospitals (2020-2021).
  • Included over 200,000 peripheral venous catheters (PVCs).
  • Utilized univariable and multivariable Cox regression models to analyze catheter size and BSI risk, controlling for confounders.

Main Results:

  • Catheters with larger diameters (≤16G) were significantly associated with a higher risk of PVC-associated BSI (adjusted HR 4.65).
  • Sensitivity analyses confirmed this association across different scenarios, including dwell time and patient population.
  • Over 5% of PVCs were ≤16G, with a notable incidence of BSI.

Conclusions:

  • Peripheral venous catheter (PVC) diameter size is a significant factor in the risk of developing PVC-associated bloodstream infections (BSI).
  • Consideration of PVC diameter during selection may be crucial for reducing the overall burden of PVC-associated BSI.