Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

112
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
112
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.4K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

244
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
244
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating Visual Decision Support: How Does Preference Elicitation Shape Metric Sensitivity?

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

DARE: An Explainable AI-visualization Framework for Ill-defined Decision Making.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

NNP-NET: Accelerating t-SNE Graph Drawing for Large Static and Dynamic Graphs by Neural Networks.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Investigating the Effects of Augmented Reality on Message Credibility When Visualizing Environmental Impacts.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Effects of outlier and familiar context in trend-line estimates in scatterplots.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Handling Non-Visible Referents in Situated Visualizations.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2023
Same journal

MesoSplats: Texture Synthesis with Gaussian Splatting.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

GLLA: A Unified Force-Directed Graph Layout Framework Supporting Local Adjustments.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Multi-Perception Crowd: Learning to combine entity and implicit perception for diverse crowd simulation.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Hiding in Plain Sight: Camouflaging Real-world Objects.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

RTF2Mesh: Restricted Tangent Face Based Mesh Compression With Neural Displacement Fields.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Practical Occluder Generation for Mobile Games.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K

Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails.

Basak Oral, Pierre Dragicevic, Alexandru Telea

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
    |December 25, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Understanding hurricane probabilities influences evacuation decisions. This study found that decision-making tasks, unlike judgment tasks, were less prone to inaction bias, suggesting distinct cognitive processes influence choices.

    More Related Videos

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    735
    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
    07:05

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

    Published on: September 10, 2018

    6.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
    05:48

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

    Published on: June 12, 2020

    5.8K
    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    735
    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
    07:05

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

    Published on: September 10, 2018

    6.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Risk Communication

    Background:

    • Decision-making and judgment are often conflated in research, hindering understanding of suboptimal choices.
    • Existing literature suggests decisions are less accurate than judgments, potentially due to visualization interpretation or heuristic use.
    • Clarifying the distinction between judgment and decision-making is crucial for improving risk communication and public safety.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To decouple judgment from decision-making in the context of understanding risk probabilities.
    • To investigate how task type (judgment vs. decision making), scenario (sports vs. humanitarian), and visualization type affect accuracy.
    • To determine if judgments can serve as reliable proxies for decision-making in visualization research.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducted two preregistered experiments with 601 participants.
    • Manipulated task type (judgment vs. decision making), scenario context, and visualization types (quantile dotplots, density plots, probability bars).
    • Analyzed accuracy and susceptibility to biases like status-quo bias.

    Main Results:

    • Experiment 1 was inconclusive; Experiment 2 provided evidence for differences between judgment and decision-making tasks.
    • Contrary to prior research, decisions were found to be more accurate than judgments in Experiment 2.
    • Decisions were less vulnerable to status-quo bias, indicating a potential preference for action over inaction.
    • Both scenario and visualization types significantly influenced judgment and decision-making accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Judgments cannot be reliably used as proxy tasks for decision-making in visualization research.
    • Decision-making processes may be less susceptible to certain biases compared to judgment tasks.
    • Findings have implications for designing effective visualizations for risk communication and public decision support.