Correlation between intravascular pressure gradients and ultrasound velocities in carotid artery stenosis: An...

IntroductionGrading of carotid stenosis is routinely performed with non-invasive techniques, such as carotid ultrasound (CUS) and computerized tomography angiography (CTA), which have limitations in grading definition. Moreover, the actual hemodynamic impact of a stenosis remains poorly defined. Preliminary studies explored the application of the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), measured with pressure wire (PW), but the correlation between RFR and morphological/hemodynamic parameters is still undefined. This study aims to test the correlation between RFR and CUS-CTA-DSA based degree of stenosis, to define the suitability of RFR as carotid stenosis index.MethodsWe included patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis receiving carotid artery stenting (CAS), between November 2022 and May 2023. We performed CUS and PW measurements before and after stenting, at four different sites (trans-lesion, distal cervical, petrous and supraclinoid internal carotid artery [ICA] segments). We compared CUS and PW parameters by Pearson's or Spearman test for continuous variables.ResultsAmong 15 patients included the mean stenosis degree was 81.3%. Trans-lesion RFR was significantly higher than other sites (0.72 ± 0.2 trans-lesion vs. 0.69 ± 0.18 distal cervical ICA vs. 0.66 ± 0.2 petrous ICA vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 intracranial ICA, p < 0.05). All RFR values significantly increased after treatment; the highest relative increase was registered at stenosis site (0.72 ± 0.2 pre-stent vs. 1.01 ± 0.1 post-stent, p < 0.01). Trans-lesion RFR was significantly associated with the CTA and DSA stenosis degree and CUS measurements.ConclusionsPressure wire in carotid artery stenosis seems safe and suitable. Resting full-cycle ratio has a significant correlation with CUS values and stenosis degree and might be used as carotid stenosis index during CAS.