Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Meeting high-risk patient pain care needs through intensive primary care: a secondary analysis
Karleen F Giannitrapani1,2, Jesse R Holliday3, Matthew D McCaa3
1Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System Menlo Park Division, Menlo Park, California, USA karleen@stanford.edu.
Objective:
Chronic pain disproportionately affects medically and psychosocially complex patients, many of whom are at high risk of hospitalisation. Pain prevalence among high-risk patients, however, is unknown, and pain is seldom a focus for improving high-risk patient outcomes. Our objective is to (1) evaluate pain frequency in a high-risk patient population and (2) identify intensive management (IM) programme features that patients and providers perceive as important for promoting patient-centred pain care within primary care (PC)-based IM.
Design:
Secondary observational analysis of quantitative and qualitative evaluation data from a multisite randomised PC-based IM programme for high-risk patients.
Setting:
Five integrated local Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare systems within distinct VA administrative regions.
Participants:
Staff and high-risk PC patients in the VA.
Intervention:
A multisite randomised PC-based IM programme for high-risk patients.
Outcome Measures:
(a) Pain prevalence based on VA electronic administrative data and (b) transcripts of interviews with IM staff and patients that mentioned pain.
Results:
Most (70%, 2593/3723) high-risk patients had at least moderate pain. Over one-third (38%, 40/104) of the interviewees mentioned pain or pain care. There were 89 pain-related comments addressing IM impacts on pain care within the 40 interview transcripts. Patient-identified themes were that IM improved communication and responsiveness to pain. PC provider-identified themes were that IM improved workload and access to expertise. IM team member-identified themes were that IM improved pain care coordination, facilitated non-opioid pain management options and mitigated provider compassion fatigue. No negative IM impacts on pain care were mentioned.
Conclusions:
Pain is common among high-risk patients. Future IM evaluations should consider including a focus on pain and pain care, with attention to impacts on patients, PC providers and IM teams.
More Related Videos
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
09:38Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Planning Nursing Care I
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Continuing Care
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...