Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025
qPCR Is a Sensitive and Rapid Method for Detection of Cytomegaloviral DNA in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biopsy Tissue
Published on: July 9, 2014
Quantification of low-level human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia by digital PCR
DeVon N Hunter-Schlichting1, Rachel I Vogel2, Melissa A Geller2
1Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Background:
Digital PCR (dPCR) can quantify cell-free viral DNA (DNAemia), a biomarker of active viral infection. To accelerate epidemiologic investigation into low-level viral reactivation in chronic disease, we have evaluated the performance of dPCR to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia across platforms and blood matrices.
Methods:
The droplet-based (BioRad) dPCR platform performance was compared to chip-based (BioMark), and assay validation followed dMIQE guidelines. CMV and EBV DNA reference materials were spiked into known negative plasma and serum samples. In addition, two independent cohorts of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated for viral DNAemia (n = 65 serum and 79 plasma samples).
Results:
The limit of quantification (LOQ) was at or slightly above 100 copies/mL for both instruments: 105-135 copies/mL for droplet-based detection and 100 copies/mL for chip-based detection. DNAemia in serum had a slightly lower LOQ (105-110 copies/mL) compared to plasma (LOQ; 115-135 copies/mL). The variation (CV) coefficients for each assay and machine were less than 5 %. In patient samples, CVs ranged from 4.5 - 7.4 % and were similar for cell-free DNA derived from serum or plasma. There was good correlation between DNAemia measurements in patient samples across dPCR platforms (r > 0.90 for each assay and matrix).
Conclusion:
dPCR can quantify low-level herpes virus DNAemia with CVs below 8 %. Our results indicate that using serum-derived cell-free DNA and droplet-based dPCR is optimal for quantitating low-level viral DNAemia; however, plasma and chip-based approaches are acceptable alternatives and suitable for epidemiologic investigation.
