Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Fidelity to the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice (CAPE-V): A Pilot Study
Anjli Lodhavia1, Gail B Kempster2
1Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Rush University, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Neurology, Division of Speech-Language Sciences and Disorders, Henry Ford Health, West Bloomfield, Michigan.
Speech-language pathologists show significant variability in using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Few clinicians adhere strictly to the CAPE-V protocol, indicating a need for further investigation and potential revisions.
Area of Science:
- Speech-language pathology
- Voice disorders diagnostics
- Auditory-perceptual assessment
Background:
- Auditory-perceptual voice measurements are crucial for diagnosing voice disorders.
- The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) is a widely used diagnostic tool.
- Standardized protocols ensure reliable and valid assessment results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the fidelity of clinicians in administering the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
- To identify deviations from the published CAPE-V protocol among speech-language pathologists.
- To understand current clinical practices and researcher usage of the CAPE-V.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted with 17 speech-language pathologists specializing in voice disorders.
- Participants regularly evaluate and treat patients with voice disorders.
- Data collection focused on adherence to the standardized CAPE-V administration protocol.
Main Results:
- A significant variability in CAPE-V administration was observed among surveyed clinicians.
- Few speech-language pathologists reported strictly following the standardized CAPE-V instructions.
- Deviations were noted in tasks and stimuli used during CAPE-V assessments.
Conclusions:
- This pilot study highlights inconsistencies in CAPE-V implementation.
- Findings suggest a need for further research into CAPE-V fidelity on a larger scale.
- Recommendations for revising the CAPE-V instrument and its protocol may be warranted.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
01:25Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
01:31Confirmation Biases
01:12Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...