Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Measurement of Pulse Propagation Velocity, Distensibility and Strain in an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Mouse Model
Published on: February 23, 2020
D-dimer as a Rule-Out for Aortic Dissection
Jeremy M Carter1, Roshan B Tom1, Raheed Sunesra1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Insights
Elevated D-dimer levels are highly sensitive for diagnosing acute aortic dissection (AAD). This finding suggests D-dimer testing can help rule out AAD in low-risk patients, potentially avoiding more invasive diagnostic procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Hematology
Background:
- Acute aortic dissection (AAD) presents diagnostic challenges due to varied symptoms and overlap with other conditions.
- Current diagnostic tools like CT and echocardiography are not always feasible.
- Limited research exists on D-dimer's utility in ruling out the rare condition of AAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sensitivity of elevated D-dimer levels in diagnosing AAD.
- To assess D-dimer's utility in a large patient cohort.
- To determine if D-dimer can help rule out AAD in suspected cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the TriNetX database, including 85 million patients from 54 US healthcare organizations over two decades.
- Identification of 1,319 patients with confirmed AAD who underwent D-dimer testing within 24 hours of diagnosis.
- Evaluation of D-dimer sensitivity at cutoffs of 400 ng/ml and 500 ng/ml.
Main Results:
- A D-dimer cutoff of 400 ng/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.949 for AAD.
- A D-dimer cutoff of 500 ng/ml yielded a sensitivity of 0.930 for AAD.
- Out of 1,319 AAD patients, 1,252 had D-dimer >400 ng/ml and 1,227 had D-dimer >500 ng/ml.
Conclusions:
- Elevated D-dimer levels are highly sensitive for diagnosing acute aortic dissection (AAD).
- D-dimer testing shows significant sensitivity in ruling out AAD.
- This biomarker may help avoid unnecessary invasive testing in low-risk patients presenting with suspected AAD.
Abstract:
Introduction Acute aortic dissection (AAD) represents a significant diagnostic challenge with a high mortality rate if not treated promptly. This challenge arises from the diverse clinical presentations of AAD, and its symptom overlap with other medical conditions. Although both helical CT and transesophageal echocardiography are reliable diagnostic tools for AAD, they are not feasible for every suspected case. Furthermore, limited research on D-dimer's utility in ruling out AAD has been conducted due to the condition's rarity. Methods This study utilizes the TriNetX database (https://trinetx.com/), encompassing data from 54 healthcare organizations across the United States over the past two decades from 85 million patients. The objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of an elevated D-dimer level in diagnosing AAD across a much larger patient cohort than previously studied. Results Retrospectively analyzing this dataset, there were 1,319 patients identified with a confirmed AAD who had undergone D-dimer testing within a day of diagnosis. Of these, 1,252 patients exhibited D-dimer levels exceeding 400 ng/ml while 1,227 had levels surpassing 500 ng/ml. Notably, a D-dimer cutoff of 400 ng/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.949 while a 500 ng/ml cutoff yielded a sensitivity of 0.930. Conclusion This large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that a blood D-dimer level is highly sensitive in assaying for AAD. The D-dimer levels analyzed showed a remarkable sensitivity in ruling out AAD, avoiding the need for more invasive testing in low-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

