Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

05:12
Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach for Thyroid Lobectomy
Published on: May 12, 2023
3.7K
Endocrine Patients' Views on Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy via Vestibular Approach (TOETVA)
Hui Zheng1, Jiling Chou2, Victoria Lai1
1Division of Endocrine Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 106 Irving St NW, POB 2200 North, Washington, DC 20010 USA.
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
|January 8, 2024
Summary
Endocrine patients in the US perceive TOETVA risks and benefits differently based on factors like operative time, pain, and race. Patient preferences for TOETVA versus traditional thyroidectomy vary, influencing surgical choices.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Surgical Oncology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) adoption is limited in the Western hemisphere.
- Understanding patient perceptions of TOETVA is crucial for its wider acceptance and application.
- Patient preferences significantly impact the choice between traditional thyroidectomy (TT) and newer minimally invasive techniques like TOETVA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how endocrine patients in the United States perceive the risks and benefits of TOETVA.
- To identify factors influencing patient preference between TT and TOETVA.
- To inform clinical discussions and patient-centered decision-making regarding thyroidectomy procedures.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study utilizing a de novo email survey sent to patients treated between 2018 and 2020.
- Patients rated the impact of TOETVA risks and benefits on their preference for TT versus TOETVA on a 1-10 scale.
- Multivariate analysis was employed to identify independent predictors of patient preference, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Main Results:
- A total of 422 patients responded (3.2% response rate), with 76.0% being female and 34.1% diagnosed with thyroid cancer.
- Significant differences in TT vs. TOETVA preference were observed across age, race, education, cancer diagnosis, and prior surgery history.
- Key independent predictors of preference included attitudes towards operative time, outcome data, pain, travel for care, African American race, and prior surgery history.
Conclusions:
- Patient perceptions of TOETVA's risks and benefits are highly individualized and influenced by various demographic and clinical factors.
- Factors such as operative time, perceived outcome data, pain levels, and travel considerations significantly shape patient preferences.
- Tailoring discussions about TOETVA versus TT based on these patient-specific perceptions is essential for optimal shared decision-making in thyroid surgery.

