Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

730
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
730
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

358
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
358
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

348
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
348
Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

1.0K
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
1.0K
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.3K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptom prevalence and impact on lung cancer risk in the SUMMIT study.

Chest·2026
Same author

Observational study of predictors and outcomes of lung cancer in never-smokers in the UK (OLIVE): study protocol.

BMJ open respiratory research·2026
Same author

Development of the Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Impact Measure (P-TIM).

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

UK National Screening Committee position statement on evidence required for multicancer detection tests.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

UK National Screening Committee position statement on surrogate outcomes in cancer screening trials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Psychometric Validation of the Weight and Emotions Scale (WES) in Adults with Obesity or Overweight.

Advances in therapy·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of Tezepelumab Versus Omalizumab in Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Allergic Asthma in Spain.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same journal

Availability, Prices, and Affordability of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Anhui Province, China.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same journal

Estimating the Long-Term Clinical and Economic Impact of Universal Varicella Vaccination in Portugal Using a Dynamic Transmission Model.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same journal

A Targeted Review of Available Data Sources to Support Evidence-Informed Decisions: Implications for Health Technology Assessment in South Africa.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same journal

Integrating Structured Expert Elicitation with External Evidence to Inform Earlier Reimbursement Decisions: A Norwegian Case Study of Selpercatinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same journal

Health Utility Values Measured by EQ-5D in Breast Cancer From Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

428

Health State Utilities Associated with False-Positive Cancer Screening Results.

Louis S Matza1, Timothy A Howell2, Eric T Fung3

  • 1Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA. louis.matza@evidera.com.

Pharmacoeconomics - Open
|January 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

False-positive cancer screening results cause a significant decrease in health utility, impacting quality of life. Understanding this disutility is crucial for evaluating new cancer detection methods.

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

290
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
07:59

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

428
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

290
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
07:59

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Early cancer detection improves patient outcomes and survival rates.
  • Novel multi-cancer early detection tests are emerging.
  • Economic evaluations require health state utility values.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the disutility associated with false-positive results from cancer screening.
  • To inform cost-utility analyses of cancer screening strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Composite time trade-off interviews were conducted with UK general population participants.
  • Participants valued health states describing true-negative and false-positive cancer screening scenarios.
  • Disutility was calculated as the difference in utility between true-negative and false-positive states over a 1-year horizon.

Main Results:

  • The mean utility for a true-negative result was 0.958.
  • False-positive results yielded utilities ranging from 0.847 to 0.932.
  • Disutilities for false positives ranged from -0.031 to -0.111 quality-adjusted life-year decrements.

Conclusions:

  • All false-positive cancer screening results led to a measurable decrease in health utility.
  • Higher disutility was linked to invasive procedures, prolonged uncertainty, and perceived cancer severity.
  • These utility estimates are valuable for economic modeling of cancer screening programs.