Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

Socioemotional Development during Infancy

Socioemotional Development during Infancy

Socio-emotional development in infancy is primarily shaped by early emotional responses and social connections, with temperament playing a central role. Temperament refers to the consistent patterns in an individual's emotional and behavioral responses, observable even in infancy. By examining temperament, researchers can better understand an infant's unique ways of interacting with the world, influencing subsequent personality and socio-emotional growth.
Primary Temperament Types

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fixation offset decreases manual inhibition of return (IOR) in detection and discrimination tasks.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Same author

Does temperament have a differential effect on Inhibition of Return (IOR)?

Acta psychologica·2021

Same author

Preparation of saccade sequences and eye programming affect endogenous covert attention.

The European journal of neuroscience·2020

Same author

Beta Neurofeedback Training Improves Attentional Control in the Elderly.

Psychological reports·2020

Same author

The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR).

Experimental brain research·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Temperament Affected Visuospatial Orienting on Discrimination Tasks.

Jacek Bielas¹, Damian Przybycień¹, Łukasz Michalczyk¹

¹Institute of Psychology, Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.

Perceptual and Motor Skills

|January 10, 2024

Summary

Temperament influences how quickly we orient our attention. Lower reactivity individuals show faster attentional capture in cueing tasks, unlike those with higher reactivity, as explained by the Regulative Theory of Temperament.

Keywords:

attention detection tasks discrimination tasks facilitation inhibition of return saccadic movements temperament visuospatial orienting

More Related Videos

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Differential Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

The Posner cueing paradigm reveals attentional capture and inhibition of return (IOR).
These processes reflect engagement versus withdrawal behaviors, linked to central nervous system properties and temperament.
Research on temperament's effect on visuospatial orienting is limited and yields inconsistent findings.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if individual differences in reactivity, a temperamental trait, impact visuospatial attention orienting.
To examine attentional capture and inhibition of return (IOR) in relation to varying levels of reactivity.

Main Methods:

Utilized the Posner cueing paradigm with saccadic responses.
Measured attentional orienting during discrimination cueing tasks.
Assessed individual differences in reactivity as a temperamental trait.

Main Results:

Individuals with lower reactivity exhibited attentional capture at short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA).
This resulted in a facilitatory cueing effect for low-reactivity individuals.
Individuals with higher reactivity did not show the same early attentional capture pattern.

Conclusions:

Reactivity, a temperamental trait, significantly modulates visuospatial attention orienting.
Findings support the Regulative Theory of Temperament in explaining individual differences in attentional dynamics.
Differential reactivity influences the interplay between engaging and disengaging attention.