Economic Burden of Inpatient Care for Mitral Regurgitation in Maryland

Radoslav Zinoviev1, Rani K Hasan2, James S Gammie3

  • 1Division of Cardiology University of California Los Angeles CA.

Abstract

Insights

Mitral regurgitation (MR) increases hospital costs and mortality. Interventions like valve repair or replacement lead to lower annual charges in subsequent years compared to medical management alone.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a prevalent valvular heart disease in the US, associated with increased mortality and hospitalization risks.
  • The economic impact of MR in the United States remains largely unquantified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the economic burden of mitral regurgitation (MR) in the United States.
  • To compare inpatient charges associated with different management strategies for MR.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of inpatient hospitalization data for Maryland residents from October 2015 to September 2019.
  • Assessment of total charges for patients with and without MR, stratified by management: medical, transcatheter intervention, or surgical intervention.

Main Results:

  • MR patients (26,076) had more comorbidities and higher inpatient mortality than non-MR patients.
  • Medically managed MR patients incurred average annual charges of $23,575, with MR adding $10,559 and 3.1 inpatient days annually.
  • Surgical or transcatheter interventions had higher initial charges ($47,943 and $63,108, respectively) but resulted in lower annual charges in subsequent years compared to medical management.

Conclusions:

  • Mitral regurgitation is linked to increased inpatient costs and mortality.
  • Surgical and transcatheter interventions for MR are associated with reduced long-term healthcare charges compared to medical management alone.