Comparison of IMD and ICG videoangiography in combined bypass surgery: a single-center study
Runchuan Wang1, Qingdong Han1, Yanhong Yan1
1Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Shizi Street 188#, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Background:
Superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass combined with an encephaloduromyosynangiosis (EDMS) had gained significant role in treating chronic cerebral ischemia. Invasiveness and costs of intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) limited its application in operations.
Objective:
To find the reliable parameters for determining bypass patency with intraoperative micro-Doppler (IMD) sonography and compare the diagnostic accuracy of indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography with IMD in combined bypass.
Method:
One hundred fifty bypass procedures were included and divided into patent and non-patent groups according to postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) within 72 h. The surgical process was divided into four phases in the following order: preparation phase (phase 1), anastomosis phase (phase 2), the temporalis muscle closure phase (phase 3), and the bone flap closure phase (phase 4). The IMD parameters were compared between patent and non-patent groups, and then compared with the patency on CTA by statistical analyses. IMD with CTA, ICG videoangiography with CTA, IMD with ICG videoangiography were performed to assess bypass patency. The agreement between methods was evaluated using kappa statistics.
Results:
No significant differences of baseline characteristics were found between patent and non-patent group. Parameters in the STA were different between patent and non-patent groups in phases 2, 3, and 4. In patent group, Vm was apparently higher and PI was lower in phases 2, 3, and 4 compared with phase 1 (P < .001). In non-patent group, no differences of Vm and PI were found within inter-group. The best cutoff value of IMD in the STA to distinguish patent from non-patent bypasses was Vm in phase 4 > 17.5 cm/s (sensitivity 94.2%, specificity 100%). In addition, the agreement for accessing bypass patency was moderate between ICG videoangiography and CTA (kappa = 0.67), IMD and ICG videoangiography (kappa = 0.73), and good between IMD and CTA (kappa = 0.86).
Conclusion:
ICG videoangiography could directly display morphology changes of bypass. IMD could be used for providing half-quantitative parameters to assess bypass patency. Vm in phase 4 > 17.5 cm/s suggesting the patency of bypass on CTA would be good. Also, compared with ICG videoangiography, IMD had more accuracy.
