Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

06:40
Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice
Published on: June 15, 2015
10.1K
Disparities in Olfactory Dysfunction in African Americans
Nicholas J Choi1, Kevin J Sykes2, Mark Villwock2
1University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
|January 18, 2024
Summary
African Americans (AA) performed worse than Whites on objective olfactory tests, with a higher prevalence of hyposmia. Self-reported smell function, however, showed no difference between groups.
Area of Science:
- Olfactory research
- Racial-ethnic health disparities
- Sensory science
Background:
- Olfactory function can vary across different populations.
- Objective testing is crucial for accurate assessment of smell deficits.
- Understanding racial-ethnic differences in olfaction is important for healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare olfactory performance between African Americans (AA) and Whites using objective tests.
- To identify potential racial-ethnic disparities in scent detection and identification.
- To assess the cultural relevance of scents used in olfactory testing.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study included 102 healthy adults (46 AA, 56 Whites).
- Objective olfactory tests included the Affordable Rapid Olfactory Measurement Array (AROMA) and Sniffin' Sticks (SST-12).
- Self-reported olfactory function was assessed using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22).
Main Results:
- AA participants scored significantly lower than Whites on both AROMA and SST-12.
- A higher percentage of AA (60.9%) were classified as hyposmic compared to Whites (30.4%) based on SST-12.
- AA identified fewer scents accurately on AROMA, including licorice, orange, and cinnamon.
Conclusions:
- African Americans demonstrated poorer performance on objective olfactory tests compared to Whites.
- A greater proportion of African Americans were identified as hyposmic, indicating a potential objective deficit.
- Discrepancies between objective findings and self-reported function suggest further investigation into cultural factors in scent testing.

