Extension of a conditional performance score for sample size recalculation rules to the setting of binary endpoints
Björn Bokelmann1, Geraldine Rauch2,3, Jan Meis4
1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany. bjoern.bokelmann@charite.de.
This study extends the conditional performance score for adaptive clinical trials to binary endpoints. The new method accurately assesses trial performance, aiding in sample size adjustments for better trial design.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Sample size calculation in clinical trials relies on parameter assumptions, introducing uncertainty and risks of underpowering or oversizing.
- Adaptive designs offer a solution by allowing sample size adjustments during interim analyses.
- Existing methods for adaptive designs, like the conditional performance score, are primarily developed for normally distributed endpoints.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the conditional performance score methodology to clinical trials with binary endpoints.
- To evaluate the performance and applicability of this extended score for binary outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Developed a one-dimensional score parametrization for the conditional performance score tailored to binary endpoints.
- Conducted a simulation study to assess the operational characteristics of the proposed method.
- Illustrated the practical application of the extended score.
Main Results:
- The conditional performance score theory can be directly extended to binary endpoints without modification.
- The score results are represented by a single distribution parameter.
- A unified effect measure is derived, incorporating both the difference in proportions and the control group proportion.
Conclusions:
- The conditional performance score is successfully extended to binary endpoints, broadening its applicability in clinical trial design.
- This research provides a practical tool for guiding the selection of adaptive designs with sample size recalculation for binary outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height...
Chebyshev's Theorem to Interpret Standard Deviation
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...


