Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

07:34
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
17.4K
Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework
Kristin Andrews1, Simon Fitzpatrick2, Evan Westra3
1Department of Philosophy, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3.
Summary
Social norms, crucial for understanding human behavior and enabling change, may arise from shared psychological mechanisms with animals. A comparative approach can refine hypotheses about the origins of social norms.
Area of Science:
- Comparative psychology
- Social norms research
- Animal social behavior
Background:
- Social norms are fundamental to human communities, but their origins are often assumed to be uniquely human.
- Understanding the psychological underpinnings of social norms is key to changing harmful ones.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the origins of social norms from a comparative perspective, including nonhuman animals.
- To identify psychological mechanisms underlying social norms that may be shared across species.
- To overcome theoretical obstacles in developing a comparative science of social norms.
Main Methods:
- Leveraging recent research on animal social behavior.
- Developing a six-dimensional model of psychological and social factors influencing norms.
- Analyzing theoretical obstacles to comparative norm research.
Main Results:
- Suggestive evidence indicates potential for social norms in nonhuman communities.
- Human social norms likely involve a broad spectrum of mechanisms, many shared with animals.
- A comparative perspective can broaden hypotheses for studying human social norms.
Conclusions:
- A comparative approach is valuable for understanding the variability and origins of social norms.
- Shared psychological mechanisms may contribute to social norms in both humans and animals.
- Further research integrating animal behavior can advance the science of social norms.
Related Concept Videos
Humanistic Psychology
1.1K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
1.1K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Conformity
45.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.2K
Dimensions of Health and Illness
7.3K
The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
7.3K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K

