Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.2K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

160
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
160
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social structure shapes consensus decision-making norms in small-scale societies.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Temperament and cognitive flexibility across lemur species.

Animal behaviour·2026
Same author

Linking anger and disgust to motives and anticipations of aggression in the East: testing a socio-functional account of moral emotions in Japan.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

The Multi-Capital Leadership Theory : An Integrative Framework for Human Leadership Diversity.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Guilt drives prosociality across 20 countries.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Teaching is associated with the transmission of opaque culture and leadership across 23 egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

The microlandscapes of tree trunks: the effect of lichen and tree-level characteristics on arthropod communities.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Centimetre-scale landscapes to assess the motion behaviour and cognition of gastropods and bivalves.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Intertidal microcosms of wave-swept rocky shores: ecological and physiological insights from a uniquely stressful environment.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Temporal and spatial variation in temperature and oxygen at the microscale: key niche axes for aquatic life.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Natural microcosms in ecology: fulfilling the promise of model systems?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Microbe-induced galls and plant defence: metabolite crosstalk in a co-evolutionary battle.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

70.9K

Cross-societal variation in norm enforcement systems.

Catherine Molho1,2, Francesca De Petrillo3, Zachary H Garfield4,5

  • 1Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|January 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Societies exhibit diverse norm enforcement strategies, including revenge and third-party intervention. Understanding cross-cultural punishment variations requires integrating psychological and cultural factors.

Keywords:
cross-cultural researchculturepunishmentsocial norms

More Related Videos

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.0K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

70.9K
A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.0K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Economics

Background:

  • Human societies display varied norm enforcement mechanisms, from individual revenge to institutional sanctions.
  • Cross-cultural research shows regularities but also significant variation in punishment prevalence and forms.
  • Existing studies often focus on disparate factors, hindering a unified understanding of punishment variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To integrate diverse socio-ecological and cultural factors influencing cross-societal punishment variations.
  • To provide a comprehensive view of shared and unique aspects of norm enforcement across cultures.
  • To bridge disciplinary gaps in the study of social norm enforcement.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review integrating research from anthropology, economics, and psychology.
  • Analysis of proposed socio-ecological and cultural factors driving punishment diversity.
  • Synthesis of empirical evidence from comparative cross-societal studies.

Main Results:

  • Punishment of norm violators is a widespread human behavior with diverse manifestations.
  • Cross-societal variations in punishment are influenced by a complex interplay of psychological and cultural factors.
  • Interdisciplinary integration is crucial for a holistic understanding of norm enforcement systems.

Conclusions:

  • Future research should employ diverse methodologies to explore punishment's domain-specificity and its role in social norm change.
  • Understanding the diversity of tactics supporting social norms is key to explaining societal differences in enforcement.
  • Integrating findings across disciplines offers a more complete picture of human norm enforcement.