Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution01:10

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution

3.4K
For any given polymer, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is higher than, if not equal to, the number average molecular weight (Mn). The only situation in which the weight average molecular weight and the number average molecular weight are equal is when a polymer consists only of chains with equal molecular weight. However, this never happens in a synthetic polymer, since it is difficult to control the polymerization process up to a molecular level with accuracy to a hundred percent.
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phosphorus availability mediates pathway-specific nitrogen cycling in stratified peatland microbiomes.

ISME communications·2026
Same author

From conflict to climate crisis: How wars shape the future environment.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same author

Using a Plasma Focused Ion Beam System to Characterise the Porosity Through the Oxide Scale Formed on a Martensitic 9Cr-1Mo Steel Exposed to CO<sub>2</sub>.

High temperature corrosion of materials·2026
Same author

Evaluating privacy leakages in LLM-driven ambient clinical documentation.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Linking hypolimnion to epilimnion in a stratified arctic lake: Machine learning-based estimation of hypolimnetic water quality from epilimnetic measurements.

Water research·2026
Same author

Biofilm growth is insufficient to retain large buoyant microplastics in constructed wetlands.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Mercury sorption and desorption in mosses: Molecular mechanisms and biomonitoring implications.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Occurrence of organic micropollutants in drinking water: A review of scientific literature in the scope of the EU Directive 2020/2184.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Leachate treatment reduces but does not eliminate antibiotic resistance gene contamination: Associations between Pseudomonadota and resistome persistence in treated leachate.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Polyethylene glycol outer layer regulates heterogeneous nucleation to alleviate Cr(VI) stress and promote biomineralization and denitrification performance of strain LX-6: Performance and mechanism.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the adverse outcome pathways of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease triggered by environmental mixtures via biological knowledge-driven machine learning.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Multifunctional Janus fluorescence film sensor designed with Bi-MOF: High-efficiency H<sub>2</sub>S monitoring with antibacterial and moisture---permeable ability.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

16.0K

Quantifying microplastic dispersion due to density effects.

Ben Stride1, Soroush Abolfathi1, Gary D Bending2

  • 1School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

Journal of Hazardous Materials
|January 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microplastic transport in rivers depends on polymer density and water velocity. Denser microplastics deposit at lower river speeds, influencing their fate and potential exposure in aquatic environments.

Keywords:
Emerging contaminantFluvial hydraulicsMixingPolymerSediment transport

More Related Videos

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

49.6K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

16.0K
Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

49.6K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Polymer Science
  • Fluid Dynamics

Background:

  • Microplastics are pervasive environmental contaminants.
  • Understanding microplastic transport is crucial for assessing ecological risks.
  • Previous research has not fully elucidated the role of polymer density in aquatic transport.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of polymer density on microplastic transport and fate in aquatic flows.
  • To quantify microplastic movement using densities and velocities representative of natural rivers.
  • To establish microplastic suspension and deposition thresholds based on river conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Chemically stained microplastics (PP, PE, PMMA, PEEK, PVC) were tested in a laboratory flume.
  • Solute transport techniques were employed at natural river velocities (0.016 - 0.361 m/s).
  • Movement of polymers (0.9 - 1.4 g/cm³) was quantified to simulate fluvial systems.

Main Results:

  • Microplastics generally exhibited solute-like transport, except for PP.
  • Established solute transport models successfully predicted microplastic behavior.
  • Deposition and resuspension were linked to polymer density below critical velocities (≤ 0.1 m/s).
  • Denser microplastics deposited on channel beds, following sediment transport principles.

Conclusions:

  • Polymer density significantly influences microplastic fate at lower river velocities.
  • This study provides the first microplastic suspension and deposition thresholds.
  • Findings are vital for predicting microplastic fate and organismal exposure in aquatic ecosystems.