Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Intersectorality in a conditional cash transfer programme: Actors, convergences and conflicts
José Anael Neves1, Luciene Burlandy2, Maria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros3
1Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Health and Society Institute, Federal University of São Paulo Campus Baixada Santista. Santos, Brazil.
Intersectoral collaboration for the Bolsa Família Program (BFP) in Brazil shows limited integration, with episodic actions and conflicts arising from institutional silos. Improved coordination is needed to effectively address the needs of vulnerable families.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Social Policy
- Sociology
Background:
- The Bolsa Família Program (BFP) aims to support vulnerable families in Brazil.
- Effective implementation relies on coordinated efforts across health, education, and social assistance sectors.
- Understanding intersectoral dynamics is crucial for program success and addressing socioeconomic inequalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze intersectoral arrangements between health, education, and social assistance sectors in the operationalization of the BFP.
- To identify convergences and conflicts in intersectoral collaboration within the BFP context.
- To explore the influence of these arrangements on the program's effectiveness in a peripheral urban region of Southeast Brazil.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative approach utilizing content analysis based on Actor-Network Theory (ANT).
- Interviews conducted with 17 managers from Municipal Secretariats of Health, Education, and Social Assistance.
- Interviews also included professionals from basic education, primary health care, and social assistance.
Main Results:
- Identified one-off, episodic, and discontinuous intersectoral actions with limited integration among sectors.
- Found convergences in shared conceptions about intersectoral collaboration and recognizing the same vulnerable population.
- Observed conflicts stemming from institutional conditions, sectorized work processes, and a lack of clarity on professional duties.
Conclusions:
- Intersectoral collaboration for the BFP is characterized by fragmentation and challenges in integration.
- Shared understanding of the target population offers a basis for convergence, but institutional and professional barriers hinder effective collaboration.
- Addressing these conflicts and improving sector integration is essential to maximize the BFP's impact on reducing inequalities for vulnerable families.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Social Exchange Theory
Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Causality in Epidemiology

