Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

376
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
376

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Low-Cost Sensors for Fenceline Monitoring to Measure Emissions from Prescribed Fires.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Physical Health Symptoms and Perceptions of Air Quality among Residents of Smoke-Damaged Homes from a Wildland Urban Interface Fire.

ACS ES&T air·2025
Same author

VOC source apportionment: How monitoring characteristics influence positive matrix factorization (PMF) solutions.

Atmospheric Environment: X·2024
Same author

WindCline: Sloping wind tunnel for characterizing flame behavior under variable inclines and wind conditions.

The Review of scientific instruments·2024
Same author

Characterizing methane and total non-methane hydrocarbon levels in Los Angeles communities with oil and gas facilities using air quality monitors.

The Science of the total environment·2021
Same author

Using Gas-Phase Air Quality Sensors to Disentangle Potential Sources in a Los Angeles Neighborhood.

Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

448

Utilization of a Low-Cost Sensor Array for Mobile Methane Monitoring.

Jonathan Silberstein1, Matthew Wellbrook2, Michael Hannigan1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1111 Engineering Drive, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Low-cost sensors effectively screen for fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas wells. A random forest model showed high correlation and low error, accurately predicting 80% of methane spikes.

Keywords:
low-cost sensorsmobile monitoringmodel calibrationoil and gas well emissionsquantificationscreening tools

More Related Videos

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
08:18

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions

Published on: June 12, 2016

16.8K
The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
11:02

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Published on: September 7, 2015

22.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

448
Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
08:18

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions

Published on: June 12, 2016

16.8K
The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
11:02

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Published on: September 7, 2015

22.0K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Atmospheric Chemistry
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Mobile monitoring of oil and gas emissions using low-cost sensors (LCSs) is an understudied area.
  • Fugitive methane emissions from well sites pose environmental concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of LCSs as a screening tool for mobile monitoring of fugitive methane emissions.
  • To evaluate the performance of LCSs against a reference-grade methane monitor.

Main Methods:

  • Colocation of an array of LCSs (XPOD) with a reference methane monitor (Aeris Ultra) on a mobile vehicle.
  • Calibration of LCS data using a bootstrap and aggregated random forest model.
  • Analysis of model performance, including correlation, error, and prediction of methane spikes.

Main Results:

  • A high correlation (r = 0.719) and low experimental error (RMSD = 0.3673 ppm) were found between LCS and reference methane concentrations.
  • The random forest model outperformed multilinear regression and artificial neural networks.
  • The model predicted 80% of methane spikes above 2.5 ppm with a 35% false response rate.

Conclusions:

  • LCSs, when calibrated with a random forest model, are effective screening tools for mobile methane emission monitoring.
  • Model performance remained robust even with reduced calibration data (down to 50%).
  • Further development can improve the accuracy and reduce false positives for LCS-based methane detection.