Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Student Loss: Towards the Probability Assumption in Inaccurate Supervision
Abstract:
Noisy labels are often encountered in datasets, but learning with them is challenging. Although natural discrepancies between clean and mislabeled samples in a noisy category exist, most techniques in this field still gather them indiscriminately, which leads to their performances being partially robust. In this paper, we reveal both empirically and theoretically that the learning robustness can be improved by assuming deep features with the same labels follow a student distribution, resulting in a more intuitive method called student loss. By embedding the student distribution and exploiting the sharpness of its curve, our method is naturally data-selective and can offer extra strength to resist mislabeled samples. This ability makes clean samples aggregate tightly in the center, while mislabeled samples scatter, even if they share the same label. Additionally, we employ the metric learning strategy and develop a large-margin student (LT) loss for better capability. It should be noted that our approach is the first work that adopts the prior probability assumption in feature representation to decrease the contributions of mislabeled samples. This strategy can enhance various losses to join the student loss family, even if they have been robust losses. Experiments demonstrate that our approach is more effective in inaccurate supervision. Enhanced LT losses significantly outperform various state-of-the-art methods in most cases. Even huge improvements of over 50% can be obtained under some conditions.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Regression Toward the Mean
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Reliability and Validity