Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IOL power calculation in cataract surgery: closed-form sensitivities to biometric uncertainties.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same author

Physiological chromatic model eyes for IOL characterization.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Evaluation of a New Algorithm-Based Approach in Subjective Refraction.

Journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

International consensuses and guidelines on clinical management of highly myopic cataracts: A two-round modified e-Delphi study by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) and the Asia-Pacific Myopia Society (APMS).

Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Comment on: Evidence-based functional classification of simultaneous vision intraocular lenses: seeking a global consensus by the ESCRS Functional Vision Working Group.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same author

Inter-expert agreement on epithelial thickness mapping for refractive surgery screening: variability highlights need for standardization.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Correction: Luca et al. Global and Regional Diagnostic Results of Progress Toward Cervical Cancer Elimination, According to the WHO Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review with Narrative Synthesis. <i>Diagnostics</i> 2026, <i>16</i>, 1224.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Association Between Systemic Inflammatory Response Biomarkers and Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Vertebrogenic Low Back Pain and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation: A Review of Mechanisms, Imaging-Driven Selection, and Clinical Outcomes.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Multivalvular Carcinoid Heart Disease: The Role of Echocardiography in Diagnosis and Selection for Heterotopic Bicaval Valve Implantation.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Data-Efficient and Explainable Multimodal Survival Prediction in NSCLC Using Deep Image Embeddings, Clinical Variables, and Gradient-Boosted Trees.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Anomalous Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery: Cinematic Volume Rendering Technique for Enhanced Anatomic Visualization.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.6K

Intra-Observer and Inter-Observer Variability of Intraocular Lens Measurements Using an Interferometry Metrology

Benjamin Stern1,2, Alain Saad1, Roxane Flamant1

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The NIMO TEMPO device precisely analyzes intraocular lenses (IOLs) using wavefront analysis. Its low variability in IOL power and MTF measurements shows promise for IOL metrology.

Keywords:
MTFcataractinterferometryintraocular lens

More Related Videos

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
08:27

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

956
The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

21.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.6K
Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
08:27

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

956
The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

21.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmic optics
  • Metrology
  • Optical engineering

Background:

  • Intraocular lenses (IOLs) require precise optical analysis.
  • Conventional optical bench devices can be cumbersome and lack numerical modeling capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the precision of the NIMO TEMPO, a novel device for in vitro optical analysis of IOLs.
  • To assess intra- and inter-observer variability in measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Ten measurements of eight different IOL models were performed by three operators.
  • Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to calculate variability.
  • The device analyzes IOL wavefront and generates a synthetic eye model.

Main Results:

  • Satisfactory intra- and inter-observer variability for IOL power (0.066 and 0.078 diopters) and MTF profiles (0.018 and 0.019).
  • The device offers advantages over traditional optical benches, reducing operator manipulation.

Conclusions:

  • The NIMO TEMPO demonstrates satisfactory precision for evaluating refractive and diffractive IOLs.
  • This hybrid optical-numerical analyzer is a promising tool for IOL metrology.