Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
AI-generated CT body composition biomarkers associated with increased mortality risk in socioeconomically
Matthew H Lee1, Ryan Zea2, John W Garrett2
1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. mlee5@uwhealth.org.
Purpose:
To evaluate the relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage using national area deprivation index (ADI) and CT-based body composition measures derived from fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) tools to identify body composition measures associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular events.
Methods:
Fully automated AI body composition tools quantifying abdominal aortic calcium, abdominal fat (visceral [VAT], visceral-to-subcutaneous ratio [VSR]), and muscle attenuation (muscle HU) were applied to non-contrast CT examinations in adults undergoing screening CT colonography (CTC). Patients were partitioned into 5 socioeconomic groups based on the national ADI rank at the census block group level. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to determine the association between national ADI and body composition measures. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare means across groups. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated using high-risk, high specificity (90% specificity) body composition thresholds with the most disadvantaged groups being compared to the least disadvantaged group (ADI < 20).
Results:
7785 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57 years; 4361:3424 F:M) underwent screening CTC from April 2004-December 2016. ADI rank data were available in 7644 patients. Median ADI was 31 (IQR 22-43). Aortic calcium, VAT, and VSR had positive correlation with ADI and muscle attenuation had a negative correlation with ADI (all p < .001). Compared with the least disadvantaged group, mean differences for the most disadvantaged group (ADI > 80) were: Aortic calcium (Agatston) = 567, VAT = 27 cm2, VSR = 0.1, and muscle HU = -6 HU (all p < .05). Compared with the least disadvantaged group, the most disadvantaged group had significantly higher odds of having high-risk body composition measures: Aortic calcium OR = 3.8, VAT OR = 2.5, VSR OR = 2.0, and muscle HU OR = 3.1(all p < .001).
Conclusion:
Fully automated CT body composition tools show that socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with high-risk body composition measures and can be used to identify individuals at increased risk for all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular events.
