Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Establishing a fingerprinting method for fast catheter identification in HDR brachytherapy in vivo dosimetry
Daline Tho1, Cédric Bélanger1, Erik B Jørgensen2
1Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada.
Purpose:
To use quantities measurable during in vivo dosimetry to build unique channel identifiers, that enable detection of brachytherapy errors.
Materials And Methods:
Treatment plan of 360 patients with prostate cancer who underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy (range, 16-25 catheters; mean, 17) were used. A single point virtual dosimeter was placed at multiple positions within the treatment geometry, and the source-dosimeter distance and dwell time were determined for each dwell position in each catheter. These values were compared across all catheters, dwell position by dwell position, simulating a treatment delivery. A catheter was considered uniquely identified if, for a given dwell position, no other catheters had the same measured values. The minimum number of dwell positions needed to identify a specific catheter and the optimal dosimeter location uniquely were determined. The radial (r) and vertical (z) dimensions of the source-dosimeter distance were also examined for their utility in discriminating catheters.
Results:
Using a virtual dosimeter with no uncertainties, all catheters were identified in 359 of the 360 cases with 9 dwell position measurements. When only the dwell time were measured, all catheters were uniquely identified after 1 dwell position. With a 2-mm spatial accuracy (r,z), all catheters were identified in 94% of the plans. Simultaneous measurement of source-dosimeter distance and dwell time ensured full catheter identification in all plans ranging from 2 to 6 dwell positions. The number of dwell positions needed to uniquely identify all catheters was lower when the distance from the implant center was higher.
Conclusions:
The most efficient fingerprinting approach involved combining source-dosimeter distance (i.e., source tracking) and dwell time. The further the dosimeter is placed from the center of the implant the better it can uniquely identify catheters.

