Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
On SIR-based MCDM approach: Selecting a charcoal firm using hybrid fuzzy number on a Triple Vague structure
Muthunandhini Rajadurai1, Palanivel Kaliyaperumal1
1Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abstract:
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a widely used method across various sectors to help decision-makers assess and choose the most suitable solutions from a range of available options. This research introduces an innovative framework called the Triple Vague (TV) structure for Superiority and Inferiority Ranking (SIR) within the context of MCDM. This framework incorporates interval fuzzy numbers and hesitant fuzzy numbers, including negative interval fuzzy numbers for different vague ideas. The main goal of this research is to present an effective solution to the challenge of selecting a firm, specifically focusing on the manufacturing of charcoal from waste coconut shells. The SIR approach is employed to establish two complete rankings, and a TV value is used to articulate the assessment information. In this article, our contribution lies in the proposed Triple Vague approach, which utilizes the superiority and inferiority ranking methodology to identify the best firm for charcoal manufacturing. Further, it demonstrates through an application example involving the selection of the most suitable firm among four different options based on specified criteria for charcoal production from coconut shell waste. Also, comparative analysis has been done with other MCDM methods like TOPSIS, Grey method and PROMETHEE method. This analysis examines that the proposed structure is better than other MCDM technique. Moreover, the results highlight the framework's capability to handle the hesitation, vagueness, and like other undesirable characteristics. Hence it provides valuable insights for decision-makers to thoroughly evaluate and consider the best alternatives.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Stereotype Content Model
Design Example: Aggregate Gradation
The grading, or particle-size distribution, of sand is determined using sieve analysis, with standard sizes ranging from 150 μm to 10 mm (ASTM No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in. sieve). Sand is...
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

