Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
High vs Low PEEP in Patients With ARDS Exhibiting Intense Inspiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation: A
Giuseppe Bello1, Valentina Giammatteo2, Alessandra Bisanti1
1Department of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Rome, Italy; Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome, Italy.
High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) did not consistently reduce inspiratory effort (ΔPes) in ARDS patients. Its effect on lung stress is variable, depending on changes in respiratory system compliance and alveolar overinflation.
Area of Science:
- Mechanical Ventilation
- Respiratory Physiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a mechanical ventilation strategy that may influence inspiratory effort (ΔPes).
- Inspiratory effort is a key factor in the development of self-inflicted lung injury (SILI).
- Understanding the modulation of ΔPes by PEEP is crucial for optimizing ventilator settings in ARDS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether high PEEP reduces inspiratory effort (ΔPes) in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS receiving assisted mechanical ventilation.
- To assess the impact of high PEEP on respiratory system mechanics, lung stress, and tidal volume distribution.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover study involving 16 ARDS patients with Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 200 mmHg and ΔPes ≥ 10 cm H2O.
- Patients were subjected to two PEEP levels (5 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O) combined with synchronous (PSV) or asynchronous (PC-IMV) inspiratory assistance.
- Measurements included esophageal manometry for ΔPes and respiratory mechanics, and electrical impedance tomography for alveolar recruitment, overinflation, lung strain, and tidal volume distribution.
Main Results:
- High PEEP did not significantly alter ΔPes, respiratory system driving pressure, or transpulmonary driving pressure compared to low PEEP.
- The effect of high PEEP on ΔPes and driving pressures was variable and correlated with changes in respiratory system compliance (r = -0.85, P < .001).
- High PEEP induced alveolar recruitment and redistributed tidal volume, reducing dynamic strain in ventral lung regions, but this effect was dependent on PEEP-induced alveolar overinflation.
Conclusions:
- The impact of high PEEP on inspiratory effort and lung stress in ARDS is interindividually variable.
- High PEEP may mitigate the risk of self-inflicted lung injury only if it improves lung and respiratory system compliance.
- Optimizing PEEP requires careful consideration of its effects on respiratory mechanics and potential for alveolar overinflation.
More Related Videos
06:22Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
07:20Lavage-induced Surfactant Depletion in Pigs As a Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: September 7, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Pulmonary Ventilation: Inhalation
Boyle's law becomes particularly pertinent when examining respiratory...