Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
A new paradox for well-being subjectivism
1Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford UK.
Abstract:
Subjectivists think that our well-being is grounded in our subjective attitudes. Many such views are vulnerable to variations on the 'paradox of desire', where theories cannot make determinate judgements about the well-being of agents who take a positive valuing attitude towards their life going badly. However, this paradox does not affect all subjectivist theories; theories grounded on agents' prudential values can avoid it. This paper suggests a new paradox for subjectivist theories which has a wider scope, and includes such prudential judgement theories. I outline the new paradox and show how two plausible idealisztions (coherence and consideration) will not help. Subjectivists about well-being must either add an additional idealization that can solve the paradox of judgement or explain why such paradoxes do not constitute serious objections to a theory of well-being.
Related Concept Videos
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
Neuroticism and...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Cognitive Dissonance
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

