Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Assessment of isthmus filling using two obturation techniques performed by students with different levels of clinical
Yang Yu1, Chong-Yang Yuan1, Xing-Zhe Yin2
1Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Background/Purpose:
Root canal filling is a necessary skill for dental students and an important aspect of endodontic education. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of students' clinical experiences on isthmus filling using different techniques and sealers.
Materials And Methods:
One hundred eight three-dimensional-printed resin replicas of isthmus were divided into six groups and either continuous wave of condensation (CWC) or single-cone obturation (SC) was performed. One of three sealers (AH Plus Jet®, GuttaFlow2, iRoot SP) was used together with a size-fitted gutta-percha master cone. All the obturations were completed by students with three different levels of clinical experience including senior postgraduate students (SPS), junior postgraduate students (JPS), and undergraduate students (US). The percentages of filled areas (PFA) at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the apex were analyzed using a light microscope. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA with Dunn's tests (α = 0.05).
Results:
The CWC group exhibited a higher PFA than the SC group (P < 0.05). The PFA was higher in the SPS group than in the JPS group or the US group with CWC (P < 0.05). The three clinical experience groups showed similar PFAs with SC (P > 0.05); however, when using SC with iRoot SP, the PFA was higher than with either of the other two sealers (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
CWC was found to be technique-sensitive and required clinical training. With SC, clinical experience did not improve the quality of isthmus filling without additional training. CWC was superior to SC for type IV isthmuses. When using SC, better filling quality was obtained with a bioceramic sealer.
