Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

160
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
160
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Adler's Individual Psychology01:28

Adler's Individual Psychology

707
Alfred Adler, a prominent figure in psychology, founded the school of individual psychology. In contrast to Freud's emphasis on sexual or aggressive motives, Adler suggested that individuals are primarily motivated by their purposes and goals. He believed that people strive for perfection rather than pleasure. Adler argued that individuals could creatively act upon their genetic inheritance and environmental experiences to shape their own lives, emphasizing conscious motivation over...
707

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explaining attractive and repulsive biases in the subjective visual vertical.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Post-COVID breathlessness: a mathematical model of respiratory processing in the brain.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2024
Same author

Individual beliefs about temporal continuity explain variation of perceptual biases.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

The origin of Vierordt's law: The experimental protocol matters.

PsyCh journal·2021
Same author

Image motion with color contrast suffices to elicit an optokinetic reflex in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Synaptic Information Transmission in a Two-State Model of Short-Term Facilitation.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K

Individual differences do matter.

Stefan Glasauer1

  • 1Computational Neuroscience, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany stefan.glasauer@b-tu.de https://www.b-tu.de/en/computational-neuroscience.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Integrative experimental designs should account for individual participant differences. Averaging group results may hide crucial underlying mechanisms, impacting scientific discovery.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Experimental Design
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Current integrative experiment designs primarily focus on aggregated group results.
  • This approach risks overlooking significant individual differences among participants.
  • Such variations can represent a critical, yet often ignored, dimension in experimental design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of integrative experiment designs that ignore individual participant variability.
  • To emphasize the importance of incorporating individual differences into the design space.
  • To address the potential for obscured underlying mechanisms when only group data is analyzed.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing integrative experiment design principles.
  • Critique of methodologies that average participant data.
  • Exploration of the impact of individual variability on scientific interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Integrative designs focusing solely on group outcomes downplay substantial individual differences.
  • Excluding individual participant data in design can lead to incomplete problem resolution.
  • Averaging results may obscure critical underlying mechanisms and reduce scientific insight.

Conclusions:

  • Integrative experiment designs must evolve to include individual participant data.
  • Failure to account for individual variability risks masking key scientific insights.
  • A more nuanced approach is needed to fully understand complex phenomena.