Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Estimation of genetic parameters for growth traits and kleiber ratio in dorper sheep breed
Shanbel Besufkad1, Shenkute Goshme1, Asfaw Bisrat1
1Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
Abstract:
The study aimed to estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters for growth traits and Kleiber ratio in Dorper sheep breed. Data used in this study were collected over 12 years (2012-2023) at Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center sheep research station in Ethiopia. Studied traits were body weights at birth (WT0), weaning (WT3), six month (WT6), and yearling (WT12) age; average daily gains from birth to weaning (ADG0-3), from weaning to six months (ADG3-6), from six months to yearling (ADG6-12); and Kleiber ratios from birth to weaning (KR1) and from weaning to six months (KR2). The (co)variance components were estimated with different animal models using Average Information Restricted Maximum Likelihood (AI-REML) procedure. The best-fitted model for each trait was determined using likelihood ratio tests. Phenotypic performance for WT3, WT6, WT12, ADG0-3 and ADG3-6 showed a decline trend at a rate of 0.216 kg, 0.794 kg, 0.671 kg, 2.601 g and 4.865 g over years respectively. However, WT3, WT6, WT12, ADG0-3 showed a positive genetic improvement trend at a rate of 0.029 kg, 0.043 kg, 0.049 kg and 0.257 g over years respectively. Year of birth had a significant effect (P < 0.001) on all studied traits. Model including direct genetic as well as permanent environmental effect (Model 2) was chosen as the most appropriate model for WT0. Model which included only direct genetic effect (Model 1) was the best-fit model for all other studied traits. Direct heritability estimates based on suitable models were 0.07 ± 0.06, 0.11 ± 0.06, 0.09 ± 0.07, 0.11 ± 0.09 0.11 ± 0.06, 0.00 ± 0.04, 0.15 ± 0.07 and 0.00 ± 0.04 for WT0, WT3, WT6, WT12, ADG0-3, ADG3-6, KR1 and KR2 respectively. The variance ratio for the permanent environmental effect was 0.13 ± 0.04 for WT0. Genetic correlations among the traits ranged from negative (-0.39) for WT0-KR1 to high (0.99) for WT3-ADG0-3 and phenotypic correlations ranged from negative (-0.31) for WT0-KR1 to high (0.98) for WT3-ADG0-3. The low direct heritability estimates for the studied traits indicated that genetic improvement by direct selection might be difficult. Further investigation for the unexpected declined trend of phenotypic performance over years need to be required.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
14:40Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings
Published on: October 25, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Cloning of Dolly the Sheep
Incomplete Dominance
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...